Prev: GSoC 2010 - Migration from memory ballooning to memory hotplug in Xen
Next: QoS and/or fair queueing: Stateless NAT BUG
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge on 9 Jul 2010 13:50 It is not appropriate for apply_to_page_range() to directly call any mmu notifiers, because it is a general purpose function whose effect depends on what context it is called in and what the callback function does. In particular, if it is being used as part of an mmu notifier implementation, the recursive calls can be particularly problematic. It is up to apply_to_page_range's caller to do any notifier calls if necessary. It does not affect any in-tree users because they all operate on init_mm, and mmu notifiers only pertain to usermode mappings. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge(a)citrix.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 6ab19dd..d6b89eb 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1890,7 +1890,6 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, int err; BUG_ON(addr >= end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr); do { next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end); @@ -1898,7 +1897,7 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, if (err) break; } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); + return err; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_page_range); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |