Prev: [PATCH -tip v2 2/8] perf probe: Use the last field name as the argument name
Next: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/development-process: add info on maintainers
From: Masami Hiramatsu on 6 Apr 2010 18:20 Move enable/disable_kprobe() API out from debugfs related code, because these interfaces are not related to debugfs interface. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)redhat.com> Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck(a)intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth(a)in.ibm.com> --- kernel/kprobes.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index 0ed46f3..282035f 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -1588,6 +1588,72 @@ static void __kprobes kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) arch_remove_kprobe(p); } +/* Disable one kprobe */ +int __kprobes disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp) +{ + int ret = 0; + struct kprobe *p; + + mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); + + /* Check whether specified probe is valid. */ + p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp); + if (unlikely(p == NULL)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + /* If the probe is already disabled (or gone), just return */ + if (kprobe_disabled(kp)) + goto out; + + kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; + if (p != kp) + /* When kp != p, p is always enabled. */ + try_to_disable_aggr_kprobe(p); + + if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) + disarm_kprobe(p); +out: + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_kprobe); + +/* Enable one kprobe */ +int __kprobes enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp) +{ + int ret = 0; + struct kprobe *p; + + mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); + + /* Check whether specified probe is valid. */ + p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp); + if (unlikely(p == NULL)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (kprobe_gone(kp)) { + /* This kprobe has gone, we couldn't enable it. */ + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (p != kp) + kp->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; + + if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) { + p->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; + arm_kprobe(p); + } +out: + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_kprobe); + void __kprobes dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp) { printk(KERN_WARNING "Dumping kprobe:\n"); @@ -1805,72 +1871,6 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_kprobes_operations = { .release = seq_release, }; -/* Disable one kprobe */ -int __kprobes disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp) -{ - int ret = 0; - struct kprobe *p; - - mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); - - /* Check whether specified probe is valid. */ - p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp); - if (unlikely(p == NULL)) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - /* If the probe is already disabled (or gone), just return */ - if (kprobe_disabled(kp)) - goto out; - - kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; - if (p != kp) - /* When kp != p, p is always enabled. */ - try_to_disable_aggr_kprobe(p); - - if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) - disarm_kprobe(p); -out: - mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); - return ret; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_kprobe); - -/* Enable one kprobe */ -int __kprobes enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp) -{ - int ret = 0; - struct kprobe *p; - - mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); - - /* Check whether specified probe is valid. */ - p = __get_valid_kprobe(kp); - if (unlikely(p == NULL)) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - if (kprobe_gone(kp)) { - /* This kprobe has gone, we couldn't enable it. */ - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - if (p != kp) - kp->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; - - if (!kprobes_all_disarmed && kprobe_disabled(p)) { - p->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED; - arm_kprobe(p); - } -out: - mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); - return ret; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_kprobe); - static void __kprobes arm_all_kprobes(void) { struct hlist_head *head; -- Masami Hiramatsu e-mail: mhiramat(a)redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |