[PATCH v2] [RFC] ehci: Disable wake on overcurrent (WKOC_E) and disconnect (WKDISC_E)
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: microblaze: re-enable interrupts before calling schedule
Next: USB mass storage kernel panic after two days sleep/wakeup
From: Alan Stern on 11 May 2010 10:10 On Tue, 11 May 2010, Du, Alek wrote: > > Based on your suggestion, I completely redid both of my patches. They > > are now combined into a single patch, which is meant to go on top of > > the patch you submitted this morning. It adds the stuff we talked > > about, and it cleans up some of the changes you made. > > > > Does it look good to you? > > > > Alan Stern > > > > Alan, > > It looks good and works for my hardware. Thanks a lot! > Will you submit it soon? Thank you. Yes, I will. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Alan Stern on 11 May 2010 12:00 Alek: By the way, does the Moorestown platform support multiple ports on the root hub? If it does then using a single time delay (instead of a separate delay for each port) makes sense. But if it doesn't then there's no reason to move the power-up and power-down delays outside the port loops. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Du, Alek on 11 May 2010 12:20
>-----Original Message----- >From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu] >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:58 PM >To: Du, Alek >Cc: Ondrej Zary; Linux-pm mailing list; USB list; Kernel development list >Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v2] [RFC] ehci: Disable wake on overcurrent >(WKOC_E) and disconnect (WKDISC_E) > >Alek: > >By the way, does the Moorestown platform support multiple ports >on the root hub? If it does then using a single time delay (instead of >a separate delay for each port) makes sense. But if it doesn't then >there's no reason to move the power-up and power-down delays outside >the port loops. > >Alan Stern Alan, Yes, the Moorestown platform supports multi-ports, actually my test board has three ports on the root hub. Thanks, Alek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |