Prev: [PATCHv6 8/9] VFS: rename s_dirt to s_dirty
Next: [PATCHv6 2/9] AFFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed
From: Artem Bityutskiy on 5 Jul 2010 08:30
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy(a)nokia.com>

BTRFS does not define a '->write_super()' method, so it should
not mark its superblock as dirty. This looks like some left-over.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy(a)nokia.com>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason(a)oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 7f9e053..04916cd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2938,7 +2938,6 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, dir);
BUG_ON(ret);
- dir->i_sb->s_dirt = 1;

btrfs_free_path(path);
return 0;
--
1.7.0.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCHv6 8/9] VFS: rename s_dirt to s_dirty
Next: [PATCHv6 2/9] AFFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed