PHP 5.2 (lang/php52) port
in [Ports]
|
Prev: libwpd needs gconf
Next: After horde 3.3.6_1 upgrade - php error cannot modify headerinformation - headers already sent
From: Svyatoslav Lempert on 13 Apr 2010 21:23 Hello! We have problems for a considerable quantity of users which are linked to upgrade of major version PHP 5.2 to version 5.3 in port lang/php5 They are linked to considerable incompatibility of old scripts which should are corrected and rewrited for correct work under PHP 5.3.2. Also rather a significant amount of commercial scripts used coding by Zend Optimizer, and this software does not exist for PHP 5.3 and if it will be updated by developers only in the last queue (after upgrades for windows and linux-systems) as has the limited support for FreeBSD Please, do not break FreeBSD system as a stable platform for PHP web-hosting. See this topic http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=13240 Patch published by lissyara create lang/php52 and all other php52-structure. Please include this port to ports tree, I tested this script, it works and intall PHP 5.2.12 via ports without problems. -- Svyatoslav _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Guido Falsi on 14 Apr 2010 06:09 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:23:15AM +0900, Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > Hello! > > We have problems for a considerable quantity of users which are linked > to upgrade of major version PHP 5.2 to version 5.3 in port lang/php5 > They are linked to considerable incompatibility of old scripts which > should are corrected and rewrited for correct work under PHP 5.3.2. Can't you just downgrade the php port to the previous version? If you use any of the port management tools t update them you can configure them to ignore the php ports as long as your users still have not updated their apps for the new php version(but such a condiscending attitude toward users will slow down such migration indefinitely, at least that's what happens usually with users). -- Guido Falsi <mad(a)madpilot.net> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Micheas Herman on 14 Apr 2010 06:43 On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:09 +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:23:15AM +0900, Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We have problems for a considerable quantity of users which are linked > > to upgrade of major version PHP 5.2 to version 5.3 in port lang/php5 > > They are linked to considerable incompatibility of old scripts which > > should are corrected and rewrited for correct work under PHP 5.3.2. > > Can't you just downgrade the php port to the previous version? That isn't really completely viable as there would then be no upgrade path to php 5.2.14 php, 5.2.13 was released in February of 2010 and is a security update to the 5.2.X line of php and based on past history I would expect 5.2.17 to be released. Some webapps are not going to be compatible with 5.3 for at least another 6 months maybe even 18 months. CiviCRM is not going to be compatible with 5.3 until the 3.2 branch is released some time this summer, which means a lot of Drupal and Joomla sites are not going to be able to upgrade to 5.3 until then. > > If you use any of the port management tools t update them you can > configure them to ignore the php ports as long as your users still > have not updated their apps for the new php version(but such a > condiscending attitude toward users will slow down such migration > indefinitely, at least that's what happens usually with users). But, also may leave servers unnecessarily exposed to security vulnerabilities. Personally, I see greater demand for php52 than php6 which does have a port. > > -- > Guido Falsi <mad(a)madpilot.net> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org" -- The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug. -- Mark Twain _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Guido Falsi on 14 Apr 2010 08:15 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:43:14AM -0700, Micheas Herman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:09 +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:23:15AM +0900, Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > We have problems for a considerable quantity of users which are linked > > > to upgrade of major version PHP 5.2 to version 5.3 in port lang/php5 > > > They are linked to considerable incompatibility of old scripts which > > > should are corrected and rewrited for correct work under PHP 5.3.2. > > > > Can't you just downgrade the php port to the previous version? > > That isn't really completely viable as there would then be no > upgrade path to php 5.2.14 php, 5.2.13 was released in February > of 2010 and is a security update to the 5.2.X line of php and > based on past history I would expect 5.2.17 to be released. The maintainer of the php ports has already stated that maintaining the php port framework is a considerable burdern. I'm not him. I'm quite happy with the presenty situation since I run very few php webapps written by others(and various smallish ones written by myself). I can't really comment on his decisions. FreeBSD being a voluntary work effort he has the right to do whatever he likes. If you really need this you could try creating the needed ports. Basing your effort on the old verion of the existing ones should give you a good headstart. I really don't see any option from you. Anything that is in FreeBSD is there because some interested party made it happen. This is true for BASD since it's original conception at the Berkeley University in 1977(from the history I've studied at last). -- Guido Falsi <mad(a)madpilot.net> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Alex Keda on 14 Apr 2010 13:42
14.04.2010 16:15, Guido Falsi пишет: > The maintainer of the php ports has already stated that maintaining the > php port framework is a considerable burdern. > > I'm not him. I'm quite happy with the presenty situation since I > run very few php webapps written by others(and various smallish > ones written by myself). I can't really comment on his decisions. > FreeBSD being a voluntary work effort he has the right to do whatever > he likes. > > If you really need this you could try creating the needed ports. Basing > your effort on the old verion of the existing ones should give you a > good headstart. > > I really don't see any option from you. Anything that is in FreeBSD is > there because some interested party made it happen. > > This is true for BASD since it's original conception at the Berkeley > University in 1977(from the history I've studied at last). so many people want php5.2 in ports. I am ready to support this set of ports. but ale@ does not respond to my letters =) ========= I do not really important - it will take to the ports tree or not, I will in any case, I will support this patchset, but if it does not take it, I modify it to what is needed specifically for me, but not all (adding to it png1.2, Zend3.3.9 ....) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org" |