From: JLA on
The CX2 dipped its toe into the pool last August, but already there's
a successor�the CX3. The main difference is the 10-megapixel
back-illuminated CMOS sensor (upgraded from the 9.29-megapixel used
in both the CX2 and CX1).

The US pricing hasn't been confirmed yet, but over in Australia
they'll be able to pick one up for AU$499 (US$443) later this month.

HD video recording is listed as 1280 x 720 res, a welcome upgrade from
the CX2's 640 x 480, as is the 10.7x 28-300mm optical wide-angle zoom
lens. Really, anyone who bought a CX2 six months earlier must be
feeling annoyed right about now

View the attachments for this post at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=36891007#36891007

From: Irwell on
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:42:05 -0600, JLA wrote:

> Really, anyone who bought a CX2 six months earlier must be
> feeling annoyed right about now

Why?
From: Rich on
On Feb 3, 3:42 pm, i...(a)jlaenterprises-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (JLA)
wrote:
Really, anyone who bought a CX2 six months earlier must be
> feeling annoyed right about now
>
> View the attachments for this post at:http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=36891007#36891007

No worse than Olympus users stuck with the E-P1.
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on
Irwell <hook(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:42:05 -0600, JLA wrote:

>> Really, anyone who bought a CX2 six months earlier must be
>> feeling annoyed right about now

> Why?

Because *everyone* knows that once a successor camera is out,
your camera is just stylish and cool, but it doesn't take any good
photos any more --- probably it just stops working on the spot.
And the difference between 9.2 and 10 MPix is world changing, too.

-Wolfgang