PNAC of course said it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks".
in [Physics]
|
Prev: COME SEE NUTBAG * HATES US * COMMIT AD HOMINEM FALLACY; 9/11 was not physically possible to be an inside job. That nutbaggery has been thoroughly disproven.
Next: Doppler energy extraction: new solar cell technology
From: * US on 25 Jun 2010 08:38 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:18:09 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Iarnrod wrote: >> On Jun 23, 5:42 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Iarnrod wrote: >>>> On Jun 22, 7:36 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>> * US * wrote: > >>>>>> http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf >>>>>> Their own words. > >>>>> Here's a direct quote: > >>>>> "Further, the process of transformation, even if it >>>>> brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long >>>>> one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event >>>>> like a new Pearl Harbor." > >>>>> After 9-11, the Bush regime referred to the 9-11 attacks as >>>>> a new Pearl Harbor, an opportunity, and a win. And of course >>>>> the plans to bomb and terrorize the People of Afghanistan were >>>>> on Bush's desk prior to 9-11-01. The Bush regime and its cronies >>>>> in the oil/weapons business have benefited immensely from the >>>>> 9-11 tragedy, while the rest of the world has suffered. This >>>>> begs the question, do nut jobs like ironhead lie about 9-11 due >>>>> to its hate for freedom, truth, justice, and America, or due to >>>>> its extreme ignorance and stupidity? Either way, thanks for doing >>>>> your part to expose ironhead's lies. > >>>> Thank you, Hankie > >>> No, thank *you*, ironhead.... <g> > >> You "thank" me for pointing out that you yourself provided the PROOF >> POSITIVE > > Actually, US posted the link, but since I knew you wouldn't be >able to find it, I quoted the comment proving that the authors >of PNAC wanted a new Pearl Harbor type attack against the United >States. > I'm thanking you for repeatedly and convincingly demonstrating >that pretty much everything you write is a lie, and that you're >insane. Thanks again... <chuckle> That's the bushkultie's best excuse for worshipping war criminals. He can't even seem to learn how to read for comprehension. His neocon masters count on that. See "Dunning-Kruger Effect". http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/the-anosognosics-dilemma-somethings-wrong-but-youll-never-know-what-it-is-part-5/
From: Iarnrod on 27 Jun 2010 00:01 On Jun 25, 6:38 am, * Hates US * lied: <snip lies> Hey kooker, how come you have yet to be able to provide a link to any cite where PNAC said it "wanted" the attack? How long do you "think" you can evade your obvious failure to do so?
From: * US on 27 Jun 2010 06:56
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:18:09 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Iarnrod wrote: >> On Jun 23, 5:42 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Iarnrod wrote: >>>> On Jun 22, 7:36 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>> * US * wrote: > >>>>>> http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf >>>>>> Their own words. > >>>>> Here's a direct quote: > >>>>> "Further, the process of transformation, even if it >>>>> brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long >>>>> one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event >>>>> like a new Pearl Harbor." > >>>>> After 9-11, the Bush regime referred to the 9-11 attacks as >>>>> a new Pearl Harbor, an opportunity, and a win. And of course >>>>> the plans to bomb and terrorize the People of Afghanistan were >>>>> on Bush's desk prior to 9-11-01. The Bush regime and its cronies >>>>> in the oil/weapons business have benefited immensely from the >>>>> 9-11 tragedy, while the rest of the world has suffered. This >>>>> begs the question, do nut jobs like ironhead lie about 9-11 due >>>>> to its hate for freedom, truth, justice, and America, or due to >>>>> its extreme ignorance and stupidity? Either way, thanks for doing >>>>> your part to expose ironhead's lies. > >>>> Thank you, Hankie > >>> No, thank *you*, ironhead.... <g> > >> You "thank" me for pointing out that you yourself provided the PROOF >> POSITIVE > > Actually, US posted the link, but since I knew you wouldn't be >able to find it, I quoted the comment proving that the authors >of PNAC wanted a new Pearl Harbor type attack against the United >States. > I'm thanking you for repeatedly and convincingly demonstrating >that pretty much everything you write is a lie, and that you're >insane. Thanks again... <chuckle> That's the bushkultie's best excuse for worshipping war criminals. He can't even seem to learn how to read for comprehension. His neocon masters count on that. See "Dunning-Kruger Effect". http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/the-anosognosics-dilemma-somethings-wrong-but-youll-never-know-what-it-is-part-5/ It's why the bushworshipper doesn't realize that he can't read for comprehension. |