POOR STEPHEN HAWKING SHORT OF COMMON SENSE
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Mechanism and effect of a hydroturbulent activation of cement in nanothechnology of composite granular mediums (Edition: To 70-J. from birthday prof.Dr.Kutolin S.A.)
Next: NEWTON AND MAXWELL REASONABLE, EINSTEIN ABSURD
From: razvlekatsa zabavlatsa on 1 May 2010 16:51 On Sat, 1 May 2010 09:43:53 -0700 (PDT), bert <herbertglazier79(a)msn.com> wrote: >I have a better chance for a Nobel Hwkings is not a great thinker. Neither are you. You guys at Kinnecome need to give it up. I'm leaving the country and there's nothing you can do about it. If your handlers want to come to kill me, there will be a problem. chow.
From: bert on 1 May 2010 18:09 On May 1, 1:33 pm, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote: > bert wrote: > > On May 1, 11:27 am, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> > > wrote: > >> Intrepid wrote: > >>> < > >>> i learned last night that Stephen Hawking ain't so smart after all. > >> An idiot accusing S.H., with wistful fantasy dung. > > > I have a better chance for a Nobel Hwkings is not a great thinker. > > TreBert > > He is not senile however. > Also he will be known in history much longer than bert and intrepid, > and for much better reasons. Burry your head in shame. I have more hits in Google. My universe equasion G=EMC^2 is known through out the world. My photography(fast picture too. I am more clever than Hawkings. He is not Nobel material. TreBert
From: Sjouke Burry on 1 May 2010 18:33 bert wrote: > On May 1, 1:33 pm, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> > wrote: >> bert wrote: >>> On May 1, 11:27 am, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> >>> wrote: >>>> Intrepid wrote: >>>>> < >>>>> i learned last night that Stephen Hawking ain't so smart after all. >>>> An idiot accusing S.H., with wistful fantasy dung. >>> I have a better chance for a Nobel Hwkings is not a great thinker. >>> TreBert >> He is not senile however. >> Also he will be known in history much longer than bert and intrepid, >> and for much better reasons. > > Burry your head in shame. I have more hits in Google. My universe > equasion G=EMC^2 is known through out the world. My photography(fast > picture too. I am more clever than Hawkings. He is not Nobel > material. TreBert You have to be REALLY stupid to think that.
From: Sam Wormley on 1 May 2010 21:07 On 5/1/10 5:09 PM, bert wrote: > > Burry your head in shame. I have more hits in Google. My universe > equasion G=EMC^2 is known through out the world. My photography(fast > picture too. I am more clever than Hawkings. He is not Nobel > material. TreBert My picture is better than yours, Herb, and the photons used to make it traveled at the speed of light! http://picasaweb.google.com/olli.dp1/InstructorSam#5450420942971012034
From: razvlekatsa zabavlatsa on 1 May 2010 21:23
On Sat, 01 May 2010 20:07:42 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: ><snip> Gravity is the mechanism which operates the Universe. |