From: Raj on 21 Feb 2007 11:39 hI I am referring to the pic at the end of the page at this link http://netra.montana.edu/docs/sas/proc/z5ults.htm A, B, C = Class variables for the _type_ variables to be correct as mentioned in the pic, I think the pic is reffering to the C, B, A as class variables. Any answers? Thanks for looking into it. Raj.
From: data _null_; on 21 Feb 2007 11:55 On Feb 21, 11:39 am, "Raj" <ramesh.cha...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > hI > I am referring to the pic at the end of the page at this link > > http://netra.montana.edu/docs/sas/proc/z5ults.htm > > A, B, C = Class variables > > for the _type_ variables to be correct as mentioned in the pic, I > think the pic is reffering to the C, B, A as class variables. > Any answers? > > Thanks for looking into it. > > Raj. No error. Type is formed from the class variables right to left. Class A B C; type = '000'b is overall (way 0 if you like) type = '001'b is C one way type = '010'b is B one way type = '011'b is B*C ....
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Proc Rank with Weighted Variables Next: research question Annual percent change |