PROOF: LHC MORE Energy than Cosmic Ray Collisions
in [Physics]
|
Prev: PROOF: LHC MORE Energy than Cosmic Ray Collisions
Next: speed of light is likely to be more accurately that of 3.14159.. x 10^8 m/s; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #185; ATOM TOTALITY
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 03:14 Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray collisions: Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton collider is: #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. Equations at LHC's own web pages: http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 -------------------- What is "truly" terrible, is those that said Cosmic Rays were more likely to produce black holes than LHC. Yet they are shown they were wrong, but they still argue and claim to know more than THEIR MASTER. 2010: Before Einstein, GUSKZ
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 04:05 On Jun 21, 3:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > collisions: > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > collider is: > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 > > -------------------- > > What is "truly" terrible, is those that said Cosmic Rays were more > likely to produce black holes than LHC. > > Yet they are shown they were wrong, but they still argue and claim to > know more than THEIR MASTER. > > 2010: Before Einstein, GUSKZ And then 14 TeV will be 10^13 which is 1000 times greater than a cosmic ray collision.
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 15:37 On Jun 21, 11:00 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > -- > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ TROLL Oppose the words written "if you can", or TROLL AWAY.
From: PD on 21 Jun 2010 18:10 On Jun 21, 2:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > collisions: > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV Math error. The equation is sqrt(2 * m_n * E_cr). You'll see it in the very page you reference. This is sqrt (2 * 10^9 * 10^20) eV = sqrt(20*10^28) = 4.5*10^14, which is 450 times a TeV. > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > collider is: > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 Yes, you'll note in the page that you reference that the energy of the proton in a fixed-target collision would have to be 10^17 eV to be equivalent to the energies at LHC. But cosmic ray protons can be a 1000 times larger energy. Try again. > > -------------------- > > What is "truly" terrible, is those that said Cosmic Rays were more > likely to produce black holes than LHC. > > Yet they are shown they were wrong, but they still argue and claim to > know more than THEIR MASTER. > > 2010: Before Einstein, GUSKZ
From: funkenstein on 23 Jun 2010 10:17
On Jun 22, 12:10 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 2:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > > collisions: > > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV > > Math error. > The equation is sqrt(2 * m_n * E_cr). You'll see it in the very page > you reference. > This is sqrt (2 * 10^9 * 10^20) eV = sqrt(20*10^28) = 4.5*10^14, which > is 450 times a TeV. > > > > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > > collider is: > > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > >http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 > > Yes, you'll note in the page that you reference that the energy of the > proton in a fixed-target collision would have to be 10^17 eV to be > equivalent to the energies at LHC. But cosmic ray protons can be a > 1000 times larger energy. > > Try again. > > Thanks for your response.. I had had no idea what the OP was about. |