Prev: inequality question
Next: Intersection of Complex Submanifolds (Incl. Self-Int.) ispositive
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 31 Jul 2010 14:32
The Proof is simple and not understood by the "Fermatists" for
centuries that Math is not at zero and +1 , but a - weighted minus 1
and 3


1*1=1 1+1=2 2-1= 1*********** 1 equalizes with1

2*2=4 2+2=4 4-4=0

3 *3=9 3+3=6 9-6=3*********** 3 equalizes with 3


It is simple a 1 before a zero, is weighted -1, and that is the
reason that -1*-1= +1,-1-1=+1 change of polarity. SO mathematics root
is -1 and 3, This has been the basis of inverse-1 tangent. By what
mathematics proof is any one going to say that a 1 that precedes/
follows a zero is not weighted-1 ???

The mistake of Current Fermmatist mathematics is evident in the
square root of 3, and by simple equation above

The square root of 3- square root of 2 Should = 1/3 root of -1
(0.999) 0r 0.333., but currently

sqrt 3-sqrt 2= 0.3178372452 an error of 0.333-0.3178372452 =
0.0151527548 combined error below 3 , thus your computations below 3
are in error


"Weighted -1" , simply means that its polarity is negative and
inverse and it mathematically is weighted by the whole pile above.+1
is on the other hand not a recepticle but a pile driver ,
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: inequality question
Next: Intersection of Complex Submanifolds (Incl. Self-Int.) ispositive