From: Androcles on

<paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1f92c9ac-cb75-44cb-a857-2fe7bc5d6ddc(a)w17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 abr, 21:59, Ste <ste_ro...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8 Apr, 14:53, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It's not about "faith over evidence". The evidence is meaningless
>> without interpretation. The real question, which is the same as it
>> ever was in human history, is *how* we are to interpret evidence, not
>> *whether* we are to interpret it.
>
> Let us explore this for a moment, in the form of a very simple
> gedanken

x1=(x'1+vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)" -- papabozo

Ref:
news:90f88419-b50e-445b-826a-0136aff5f79e(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

========================================
Bwahahahahahaha!

x'1 = (x1-vt)/ sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

x1-vt = x'1 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
x1 = x'1*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) + vt

Papa bozo is too stupid to manage simple schoolboy algebra!