From: Androcles on 9 Apr 2010 10:40 <paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1f92c9ac-cb75-44cb-a857-2fe7bc5d6ddc(a)w17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > On 8 abr, 21:59, Ste <ste_ro...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 Apr, 14:53, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> It's not about "faith over evidence". The evidence is meaningless >> without interpretation. The real question, which is the same as it >> ever was in human history, is *how* we are to interpret evidence, not >> *whether* we are to interpret it. > > Let us explore this for a moment, in the form of a very simple > gedanken x1=(x'1+vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)" -- papabozo Ref: news:90f88419-b50e-445b-826a-0136aff5f79e(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com ======================================== Bwahahahahahaha! x'1 = (x1-vt)/ sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) x1-vt = x'1 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) x1 = x'1*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) + vt Papa bozo is too stupid to manage simple schoolboy algebra!
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Solutions to Schutz 2nd editions excercises Next: quasars and pulsars |