Prev: off topic but please forgive me me and answer
Next: AUTHENTIC DESIGNER HANDBAGS WWW.VOGUELANDE.COM. CHANEL, LOUIS VUITTON, GUCCI
From: aminer on 4 Apr 2010 02:28 Skybuck wrote: >Some notes/pointers: >1. The adventage of "blocking locks" on windows is that it doesn't consume >so much cpu (?) when it's waiting... this leads to lower cpu temperatures. >2. Nowadays I want to make my programs run as "cold" as possible to save the >system from overheat death. >3. Spinlocks make the cpu run hot and there is bad ?! Unless very maybe the >blocking scenerio would be worse, but that needs to be proven first. Read carefully: "The worker threads enters in a wait state when there is no job in the lock-free queues - for more efficiency -" http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/threadpool.htm So, my Thread Pool Engine doesn't consume any CPU when there is no job in the queues , and this leads to lower cpu temperatures. :) Sincerely, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |