Prev: Bad Questions?
Next:  True/False: “ The cosmos has remained uniform but lost density. ”.
From: Jimbo on 12 Apr 2010 07:31
On Apr 12, 6:45 am, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

I agree that there should be no statute of limitation on child
molesting/abuse. I guess the church should have thought of
"frivolous lawsuits" when they were busy covering up real cases, and
supporting, protecting, and enabling their pedophile priests.
From: [SMF] on 12 Apr 2010 08:37
On 4/12/2010 7:05 AM, Yap wrote:

> Why should RCC be so blatant obvious to wish to protect those
> molestors, especially those supposedly god's servent?
> It shows religious bigots do not think there is god to punish them in
> hell....
> which in turn really is telling every one that there is no such thing
> as god, hell, or heaven.

They're not allowed to marry, or be with women...you figure it out.

From: Jeroen Belleman on 12 Apr 2010 11:17
Uncle Al wrote:
> [...] Jews and Muslims prefer genital
> mutilation of their young boys

As do Americans, I gather...

Jeroen Belleman
From: Colanth on 12 Apr 2010 12:48
On 4/12/2010 6:45 AM, HVAC wrote:

> The "legislation would undermine the mission of the Catholic Church in
> Connecticut, threatening our parishes, our schools, and our Catholic
> Charities," the letter says.

Only if "the mission of the Catholic Church in Connecticut" is to keep
criminals from having to face the penalties imposed for their crimes.
And if that's so, then the Church, or the Connecticut Catholic
Public Affairs Conference, is indicting the Church.
From: Ala on 12 Apr 2010 20:53

"Double-A" <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote in message
news:8de435fe-a243-4742-a06a-9d955f6b0b7a(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

>I don't know why there are statues of limitations on any liability
>suits at all.

because unlike many other data bases, human memory fades. Thus, the
accuracy and credibility of the testimony becomes less credible the further
away it is from the incident. Therefore, a limitation is reasonable. In
addition to which, relevant data is lost. People lose records. Records are
destroyed based on scheduled dates. It would be unreasonable for record
holders to keep information for such a long time just in the event some one
might one day decide to sue about an incident or residual described in said
record might be needed. Storing such records is costly.

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Bad Questions?
Next:  True/False: “ The cosmos has remained uniform but lost density. ”.