From: Divya Bhagavan[MSFT] on 6 Apr 2010 15:17 Hi, Please forward your request to microsoft.public.windows.server.general. Thanks Divya "Leythos" <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25f84a04524a947c98a169(a)us.news.astraweb.com... >I have a small 3ghz Quad Core 2003 server running as a Terminal Server. > > For standard office applications it's fine, no problems with > performance. The system has 4GB ram, never seems to use more than 1GB > and the CPU load shows about 15% across all cores at peak times, > normally about 15% on core 1 and 2-8% on the other cores. Typically > there are 1-5 users connected at any given time. > > Users connect remotely across the internet via Business DSL connections > that are rated for 3mbps/3mbps and testing shows that they get that > up/down almost always. > > The server is sitting on a 10mbps fiber connection (behind a firewall). > > We've had issues with some users running a real-time mapping program > that shows live updates for truck locations - it performs very slowly, > screen updates are terrible for the maps, but their MS Office apps > update fine (when not running the mapping application). The only > performance hit is when using the mapping application - CPU load still > runs under 15% and memory doesn't increase, drive queue's don't > increase... So it appears to be the large screen area update and the > fact that the maps update in real-time faster than the screens can > redraw. > > I've always been under the impression that TS was not something anyone > would want to run graphics apps on, but I wanted to check and see if > anyone has a performance suggestion that I might not be aware of. > > Thanks > > > > -- > You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little > voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. > Trust yourself. > spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: SYSTEM User account is the key Next: Use CA on RD Web Access Server |