From: Otto Bahn on
"Richard Chambers" <richard.chambers7_NoSpam_(a)ntlworld.net> wrote

> I do not understand why we are posting all this to alt.religion.kibology
> (where it is probably not relevant), or to sci.physics (where it is too
> trivial and basic). My apologies to both groups if this is a nuisance. I
> have done so only because everybody else seems to be doing it. What is
> "kibology", anyway?

You can't resist it - it's electric! Boogie-woogie-woogie.

--oTTo--


From: PaulJK on
Shelly wrote:
> "Shelly" <shelly(a)cat-sidh.net> wrote in message
> news:hot2mr$8s5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> "Richard Chambers" <richard.chambers7_NoSpam_(a)ntlworld.net> wrote in
>> message news:HsCdnRanHrUzcyzWnZ2dnUVZ8kqdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk...
>>
>>> I do not understand why we are posting all this to
>>> alt.religion.kibology (where it is probably not relevant),
>>
>> *Everything* is relevant to Kibology. Alsotoo, you are Allowed.
>
> Or irrelevant.

Why *or*?
pjk

> Hard to tell the difference, sometimes, and I'm pretty
> sure it doesn't matter, anyway.
From: Shelly on

"PaulJK" <paul.kriha(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:hot5ld$bke$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Shelly wrote:
>> "Shelly" <shelly(a)cat-sidh.net> wrote in message
>> news:hot2mr$8s5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> "Richard Chambers" <richard.chambers7_NoSpam_(a)ntlworld.net> wrote in
>>> message news:HsCdnRanHrUzcyzWnZ2dnUVZ8kqdnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk...
>>>
>>>> I do not understand why we are posting all this to
>>>> alt.religion.kibology (where it is probably not relevant),
>>>
>>> *Everything* is relevant to Kibology. Alsotoo, you are Allowed.
>>
>> Or irrelevant.
>
> Why *or*?

I tend to think of relevance and irrelevance as being mutually
exclusive. Just one of my many hang-ups. YMMV, of course.

--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net/blog