From: R H Draney on
Murray Arnow filted:
>
>Peter Moylan wrote:
>>
>>I had a similar experience in my second university year. In the Physics
>>subject the p-n semiconductor junction was explained in a certain way.
>>In a parallel Electrical Engineering subject it was explained in a
>>completely different way. Each of those subjects helped me pass the
>>other one. I would still maintain that nobody could really understand
>>the p-n junction unless they had seen /both/ the EE and the Physics
>>explanation.
>>
>
>Two explanations? Pray tell how does a physics understanding differ from
>an engineering understanding?

The physics understanding makes sense, and the engineering understanding
works....r


--
"Oy! A cat made of lead cannot fly."
- Mark Brader declaims a basic scientific principle
From: Murray Arnow on
R H Draney wrote:
>Murray Arnow filted:
>>Peter Moylan wrote:
>>>I had a similar experience in my second university year. In the Physics
>>>subject the p-n semiconductor junction was explained in a certain way.
>>>In a parallel Electrical Engineering subject it was explained in a
>>>completely different way. Each of those subjects helped me pass the
>>>other one. I would still maintain that nobody could really understand
>>>the p-n junction unless they had seen /both/ the EE and the Physics
>>>explanation.
>>>
>>
>>Two explanations? Pray tell how does a physics understanding differ from
>>an engineering understanding?
>
>The physics understanding makes sense, and the engineering understanding
>works....r
>
This is useless information, but it does answer the question. Is there a
vaccine available to stop the virus introduced by P.T. Daniels?