Prev: Nasal Drone Government not up to speed on NBN
Next: SP2 support forXP to finish...........
From: terryc on 28 Jun 2010 20:30
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:44:55 +1000, B J Foster wrote:


> Read the words - there is no evidence that cellphone radiation has any
> ill-effect on health whatsoever.
>
> Every few years, some attention-getting twit raises the issue again & it
> is invariably shown that there is no evidence.

Correct and Correct so far.

However, it is a bit like testing a drug on a short lived animal and
determining that it is okay to administer to a long lived animal and
assuming that there will never ever be any side effects.


From: Brad on 29 Jun 2010 00:29


"terryc" <newsninespam-spam(a)woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:i0beq8$10p$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
: On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:44:55 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
:
:
: > Read the words - there is no evidence that cellphone radiation has any
: > ill-effect on health whatsoever.
: >
: > Every few years, some attention-getting twit raises the issue again & it
: > is invariably shown that there is no evidence.
:
: Correct and Correct so far.
:
: However, it is a bit like testing a drug on a short lived animal and
: determining that it is okay to administer to a long lived animal and
: assuming that there will never ever be any side effects.
:
:

Thank you for smoking is the movie with that plot at the end isn't it.

--
Brad Leyden
6� 43.5816' S 146� 59.3097' E WGS84
To mail spam is really hot but please reply to thread so all may benefit (or
laugh at my mistakes)
>
>


From: Rod Speed on 29 Jun 2010 06:13
terryc wrote
> B J Foster wrote

>> Read the words - there is no evidence that cellphone
>> radiation has any ill-effect on health whatsoever.

>> Every few years, some attention-getting twit raises the issue
>> again & it is invariably shown that there is no evidence.

> Correct and Correct so far.

> However, it is a bit like testing a drug on a short lived animal and
> determining that it is okay to administer to a long lived animal and
> assuming that there will never ever be any side effects.

Nope, nothing like.


From: Jock on 29 Jun 2010 08:02

"B J Foster" <bjfoster(a)fuckedbybluegrassmusic.yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in
message news:i0b8l2$v5n$1(a)bjf.motzarella.org...
:
: This garbage again!
: There is a link between phone use and IQ - people who do not use
: hands-free devices while driving generally have a low IQ.


......and you use yours a bit when you are playing that bluegrass music BJ!
Are you one who has the phone on hands free holding it in front of your face,
still driving one handed & talking then?
Asbestos was all good as well. For a time.



From: B J Foster on 29 Jun 2010 14:13
Jock wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster(a)fuckedbybluegrassmusic.yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in
> message news:i0b8l2$v5n$1(a)bjf.motzarella.org...
> :
> : This garbage again!
> : There is a link between phone use and IQ - people who do not use
> : hands-free devices while driving generally have a low IQ.
>
>
> .....and you use yours a bit when you are playing that bluegrass music BJ!
> Are you one who has the phone on hands free holding it in front of your face,
> still driving one handed & talking then?
> Asbestos was all good as well. For a time.
>

Wot is the relationship between asbestos and mobile phones?
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Nasal Drone Government not up to speed on NBN
Next: SP2 support forXP to finish...........