From: spudnik on
<deletia impletum>

if the Commission used the silly "pancake theory," does it mean
that the planes were not bombs?

thus:
waves don't have velocity; only (undirected) speed. although,
a "photon" or other corpuscle could have a direction. I guess that
Fizeau showed that the speed of light waves could depend
upon the velocity of the *medium*, though -- some thing
that eluded me til this moment. (however,
I am not saying that the cosmical redshift is doppleroid .-)

I already gave the cite of M&M, where they give their "velocity
of or w.r.t. the aether" or not-null resultage.

> Light is a travelling electromagnetic wave motion, and its velocity
> depends upon the medium through which it travels, and the speed of its
> emitter. The former is proved in any microwave device with
> dielectric, and the latter is proved by the null result of the MMI
> experiment. The Doppler effect, where the frequency apparently varies
> for a moving source or receiver, is a further indication.
>
> Thus f = (c(mu, ep, v)/wavelength;
> where c(mu, ep, v) = c(mu, ep) + v

> einsteinians.

thus:
I do recommend tripolars, to set-up the problem.
> UTM is not needed here. No geodesics required at this time.
> I'm just trying to find a coord system or method that allows me to
> position my view at each station to determine alt/az from the two
> stations of two points on the path of an event, start and end.

thus:
although one is primary, is it ever considered, a proper divisor?
> A number is prime if and only if it have two divisors.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html