Photo of Monastery
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Ofnuts on 9 May 2010 16:36 On 09/05/2010 07:17, mmyvusenet wrote: > Hello: > > I took these photos in the interesting Historical Center of Lima: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ Top of tower is cut off, as well as the base of the fountain. The false symmetry displeases me. I would have either taken the frontage in portrait from the axis, or moved to the right to get more of the building. And learn to use image processing software to straighten vertical lines in such photographs. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ Too dark... the statue in the middle is too small to be the only thing correctly exposed in the picture (or crop the picture around it). Might be a good candidate for HDR. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ Leaning on the left (and once this corrected, perspective must be fixed too as above). Not much to see. And the hideous sign on wall should be removed. General comments: 1) learn to use image processing software for basic fixes 2) put a larger size on Flickr, discussing postage-stamp sized pictures is tiresome -- Bertrand
From: tony cooper on 9 May 2010 16:38 On Sun, 09 May 2010 19:38:55 GMT, Winniethepooh(a)100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote: >In article <sa1eu59n90sbrf7cifmppva0acugk6udph(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>On Sun, 9 May 2010 10:31:37 -0700, Savageduck >><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >> >>>On 2010-05-09 09:54:40 -0700, Winniethepooh(a)100acrewoods.org (GMAN) said: >>> >>>> In article <84mvjmFo7vU2(a)mid.individual.net>, "mmyvusenet" >>>> <mmyvusenet(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Hello: >>>>> >>>>> I took these photos in the interesting Historical Center of Lima: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography. >>>>> >>>> Is there not any other subject to shoot in your country other than the >>>> catholic church? >>> >>>Judging by the "no camera" sign in the third shot, somebody else is >>>trying to give Miguel the same message. >>>He just won't take the hint. >> >>There are photographers who take nothing but macro shots, landscapes, >>flowers, etc. The problem isn't that his photographs are of one >>subject matter, but that the subject matter isn't of interest to this >>group. That's the group's problem, not Miguel's. >> > >Miguel's problem is that he is so brainwashed by his church that he can see no >other subject or topic of which to photograph in his mind. > Would you say that the macro photographer is so brainwashed by his interest in entomology that he can see no other subject to photograph? Why is it that a person who does macro insect photography does so because the subject interests them, but a person who photographs churches is "brainwashed"? >>I'd be interested in seeing some street shots of the people in Lima, >>but Miguel isn't interested in taking them. I respect that my >>interests are not his interests. >> >> -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Paul Furman on 9 May 2010 17:43 Ofnuts wrote: > mmyvusenet wrote: > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ > > Top of tower is cut off, as well as the base of the fountain. The false > symmetry displeases me. I would have either taken the frontage in > portrait from the axis, or moved to the right to get more of the > building. And learn to use image processing software to straighten > vertical lines in such photographs. This one is fine, the perspective doesn't bother me and at least it's not a static centered composition. >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ > > Too dark... the statue in the middle is too small to be the only thing > correctly exposed in the picture (or crop the picture around it). Might > be a good candidate for HDR. Way too dark and badly needs straightening, then it's fine: http://edgehill.net/1/temp//Clipboard01.jpg >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ > > Leaning on the left (and once this corrected, perspective must be fixed > too as above). Not much to see. And the hideous sign on wall should be > removed. > > General comments: > > 1) learn to use image processing software for basic fixes Agreed! > 2) put a larger size on Flickr, discussing postage-stamp sized pictures > is tiresome > > -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam
From: mmyvusenet on 9 May 2010 19:10 "Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> escribi� en el mensaje de noticias:hs7a9g$r69$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Ofnuts wrote: >> mmyvusenet wrote: >> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ >> >> Top of tower is cut off, as well as the base of the fountain. The false >> symmetry displeases me. I would have either taken the frontage in >> portrait from the axis, or moved to the right to get more of the >> building. And learn to use image processing software to straighten >> vertical lines in such photographs. > > This one is fine, the perspective doesn't bother me and at least it's not > a static centered composition. > > >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ >> >> Too dark... the statue in the middle is too small to be the only thing >> correctly exposed in the picture (or crop the picture around it). Might >> be a good candidate for HDR. > > Way too dark and badly needs straightening, then it's fine: > http://edgehill.net/1/temp//Clipboard01.jpg > > >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ >> >> Leaning on the left (and once this corrected, perspective must be fixed >> too as above). Not much to see. And the hideous sign on wall should be >> removed. >> >> General comments: >> >> 1) learn to use image processing software for basic fixes > > Agreed! Thank you very much for your comments, I did a change in this photo, maybe now there is some lighting improvements: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ -- MMYV http://www.mmyv.com
From: mmyvusenet on 9 May 2010 19:27 "Ofnuts" <o.f.n.u.t.s(a)la.poste.net> escribi� en el mensaje de noticias:4be71ccd$0$4635$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr... > On 09/05/2010 07:17, mmyvusenet wrote: >> Hello: >> >> I took these photos in the interesting Historical Center of Lima: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590179791/ > > Top of tower is cut off, as well as the base of the fountain. The false > symmetry displeases me. I would have either taken the frontage in portrait > from the axis, or moved to the right to get more of the building. And > learn to use image processing software to straighten vertical lines in > such photographs. > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590809970/ > > Too dark... the statue in the middle is too small to be the only thing > correctly exposed in the picture (or crop the picture around it). Might be > a good candidate for HDR. > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ > > Leaning on the left (and once this corrected, perspective must be fixed > too as above). Not much to see. And the hideous sign on wall should be > removed. Hello, thanks for your interesting comments, I did a change in this photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4590205115/ This is one of the best I could take of this part, and for the future, I'm thinking of taking this photo with a Tripode. -- MMYV http://www.mmyv.com
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: olympus 6000 fault Next: More Important: 1/7 Sensor or Backlit? |