Photoshop's use of monitor profile
in [Photoshop]
|
Prev: Photoshop CS2 error: No more virtual tiles can be allocated
Next: how to create mythbuster type of letters
From: johnboy on 20 Jun 2005 22:14 "Hecate" <hecate(a)newsguy.com> wrote in message news:9dmeb1pfcq4iavjnpjfj5c0obud8o2cer5(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:20:34 GMT, yesnno(a)att.net wrote: > > >>There was a time many would recommend using a Mac over a PC for >>"serious" graphics work. Are those days all but gone? On a Mac with >>Intel chips (soon), will the user see any difference in how colors are >>handled? > > Yes. No, it'll just work more slowly ;-) Hec, you are so cloistered! It does not become you. I have both and the Mac is not significantly faster, and definitely not cost-effectively faster.
From: Johan W. Elzenga on 21 Jun 2005 07:12 Hecate <hecate(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:20:34 GMT, yesnno(a)att.net wrote: > > > >There was a time many would recommend using a Mac over a PC for > >"serious" graphics work. Are those days all but gone? On a Mac with > >Intel chips (soon), will the user see any difference in how colors are > >handled? > > Yes. No, it'll just work more slowly ;-) Sigh. Here we go again... -- Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.nl/
From: Andrew Morton on 21 Jun 2005 07:45 "Paul N" wrote > But: I suspect that you can swap video cards (not monitors!) without > seeing any difference... Not necessarily: there will be slight differences in the hardware, even between two cards consecutively off the production line, due to manufacturing tolerances. Andrew
From: Hecate on 21 Jun 2005 18:06 On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:14:41 -0500, "johnboy" <okaynow(a)nospam.no> wrote: >"Hecate" <hecate(a)newsguy.com> wrote in message >news:9dmeb1pfcq4iavjnpjfj5c0obud8o2cer5(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:20:34 GMT, yesnno(a)att.net wrote: >> >> >>>There was a time many would recommend using a Mac over a PC for >>>"serious" graphics work. Are those days all but gone? On a Mac with >>>Intel chips (soon), will the user see any difference in how colors are >>>handled? >> >> Yes. No, it'll just work more slowly ;-) > >Hec, you are so cloistered! It does not become you. I have both and the Mac >is not significantly faster, and definitely not cost-effectively faster. > I've used Macs, and found them faster then Intel based systems. However, I now use AMD based systems and they are definitely cost-effectively faster. If it wasn't for the system price, the Mac would be too. If I had to place them in order, then I'd go AMD, Mac, Intel. (unless I was buying a laptop in which case I'd want a Pentium M Centrino system or a PowerBook G5). -- Hecate - The Real One Hecate(a)newsguy.com Fashion: Buying things you don't need, with money you don't have, to impress people you don't like...
From: Hecate on 21 Jun 2005 18:07
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:12:22 +0200, nomail(a)please.invalid (Johan W. Elzenga) wrote: >Hecate <hecate(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:20:34 GMT, yesnno(a)att.net wrote: >> >> >> >There was a time many would recommend using a Mac over a PC for >> >"serious" graphics work. Are those days all but gone? On a Mac with >> >Intel chips (soon), will the user see any difference in how colors are >> >handled? >> >> Yes. No, it'll just work more slowly ;-) > >Sigh. Here we go again... If someone asks the question... You know both AMD based computers and Mac G5s are faster and more efficient than anything Intel produces for a desktop. -- Hecate - The Real One Hecate(a)newsguy.com Fashion: Buying things you don't need, with money you don't have, to impress people you don't like... |