From: Phoenix on 19 Nov 2009 21:53 OK, I tried Macrium with Win 7 RTM. Still won't write to external on my x64 system. Tried it on my laptop running Win 7 RC x32--it ran, but it took a long time. Restore from a Macrium image yielded the same errors in the Windows logs. So I caved and bought Acronis TI 2010, mostly because I needed something now that would make images from the Recovery CD. Out of curiosity, while I had TI 2010 installed I did a test restore from an image made in Windows. The only error was the "unexpected shutdown" one. Perhaps this is inevitable when using a system that makes images while in Windows, since the system, when restored on a different date, has no record of having shut down on the previous date... I am going to send my observations to Nick in hopes that the info will be of use, and perhaps a future version of Macrium will be better for me. I like that it runs in native 64-bit. I'm not touting Acronis over Macrium; it seems a lot of folks are having trouble with the current build. In my limited experiment, I did not, but then I didn't use any of the "bells and whistles." I'm still going to make my key images outside of Windows, even when I do get round to installing the main program, which I might for image browsing and file restore. Anyway, I figured I'd let you know how it turned out. "Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> wrote in message news:hbq4ph$hdb$2(a)appyface.eternal-september.org... > Sorry for late reply... > > I would try W7 RTM (final)? It's what I've been running for quite awhile > and it does behave differently in a number of areas from the RC. However, > I never tried Reflect on the RC so I don't know what differences if any > there are from the RTM. I've had no trouble with Reflect but I'm also > running 32-bit W7 not 64-bit. > > 6 or 1/2 dozen on who to email. You could email Nick direct, but I think > it quite likely he'll be the one to answer your support email anyhow... > > As for the version question, most folk don't divulge a date unless it's in > the bag... but you could try asking Sales or Nick and see what they say. > -- > Sue Morton > > Phoenix wrote: >> It's up-to-date, but it's still Win7 RC. Maybe I should wait to see >> if it does the same thing in Win7 final? I'd rather know before I >> install Win7 final, though. >> Also, should I email support, or Nick himself (his email address is >> in the details for the downloaded file, after all)? >> And would sales know when version 5 is coming out? > >
From: Sue Morton on 19 Nov 2009 23:00 Thanks for the update, Phoenix, I really appreciate you coming back here to let me/us know. Thank for taking the time to give Nick your feedback -- I'm certain he will appreciate it. My own experiences with Acronis (both software AND support) were abysmal. That said, it doesn't really matter -- whatever works reliably and is stable is what counts. So I really can't care who the vendor is, as long as I (or you) can successfully image and restore as needed. If Acronis does the job, then absolutely stick with it! I probably won't have a 64-bit installation for some time, but it's nice to know there are folk out there paving the way for the rest of us. :-) Thanks again for working with Macrium and giving them some feedback. Happy Musiking! :-) -- Sue Morton "Phoenix" <gtr_phoenix(a)killerrabbit.verizon.net> wrote in message news:he50c2$8lt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > OK, I tried Macrium with Win 7 RTM. Still won't write to external on my > x64 system. Tried it on my laptop running Win 7 RC x32--it ran, but it > took a long time. > Restore from a Macrium image yielded the same errors in the Windows logs. > So I caved and bought Acronis TI 2010, mostly because I needed something > now that would make images from the Recovery CD. Out of curiosity, while I > had TI 2010 installed I did a test restore from an image made in Windows. > The only error was the "unexpected shutdown" one. Perhaps this is > inevitable when using a system that makes images while in Windows, since > the system, when restored on a different date, has no record of having > shut down on the previous date... > I am going to send my observations to Nick in hopes that the info will be > of use, and perhaps a future version of Macrium will be better for me. I > like that it runs in native 64-bit. > I'm not touting Acronis over Macrium; it seems a lot of folks are having > trouble with the current build. > In my limited experiment, I did not, but then I didn't use any of the > "bells and whistles." > I'm still going to make my key images outside of Windows, even when I do > get round to installing the main program, which I might for image browsing > and file restore. > Anyway, I figured I'd let you know how it turned out. > > "Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> wrote in message > news:hbq4ph$hdb$2(a)appyface.eternal-september.org... >> Sorry for late reply... >> >> I would try W7 RTM (final)? It's what I've been running for quite awhile >> and it does behave differently in a number of areas from the RC. >> However, I never tried Reflect on the RC so I don't know what differences >> if any there are from the RTM. I've had no trouble with Reflect but I'm >> also running 32-bit W7 not 64-bit. >> >> 6 or 1/2 dozen on who to email. You could email Nick direct, but I think >> it quite likely he'll be the one to answer your support email anyhow... >> >> As for the version question, most folk don't divulge a date unless it's >> in the bag... but you could try asking Sales or Nick and see what they >> say. >> -- >> Sue Morton >> >> Phoenix wrote: >>> It's up-to-date, but it's still Win7 RC. Maybe I should wait to see >>> if it does the same thing in Win7 final? I'd rather know before I >>> install Win7 final, though. >>> Also, should I email support, or Nick himself (his email address is >>> in the details for the downloaded file, after all)? >>> And would sales know when version 5 is coming out? >> >>
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Melodyne Editor Next: Recording 1/2 speed, playing back an octave higher and 2x as fast |