Prev: 'Instantaneous action at a distance'
Next: Hubble's expanding universe
From: Me, ...again! on 29 Mar 2010 08:01


On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> On Mar 29, 6:25 pm, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
> <australia.mining-pion...(a)neuf.fr> wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2:37 am, "harmony" <a...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times"<australia.mining-pion...(a)neuf.fr> wrote in message
>>
>>> news:4e2f6ae8-7977-4c54-83cc-0d1178237857(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Mar 12, 1:43 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mar 11, 9:07 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Arindam Banerjee
>>
>>> *> Your Mathematician Woof Woof friend is disinterested in you total
>>> *> triump over Einstein on Usenet, it looks.
>>
>>> Einstein was a well documented Intellectual Thief,  at the same
>>> underground level as Pasteur & Jenner by the way.
>>> Mr Arindam Banerjee is certainly right in debugging such Fraud !
>>> Honour be paid to Mr Banerjee here !
>>
>>> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
>>> Founder of the True Geology
>>
>>> -------------------------
>>> could you back it up with proof.
>>
>> Dear Harmony,
>>
>> Mr Banerjee has all the proofs needed. I can provide some more if
>> needed. E = Mc² understanding was developed by Henri Poincarré for a
>> start ( and stolen by Einstein) , and as well Mr Poincarré corrected
>> Einstein math at Nancy, where Einstein went specially for it.
>> Best regards jpturcaud- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Jean-Paul,
>
> I am not sure what Einstein stole from Poincarre.

Hi Arindam (and anyone else similarly interested),

I have seen the titles of many books, and saw one book at a library, all
questioning Einstein's contributions as "borrowings" from contributions of
earlier workers. I am not an expert at this, but, yes. there is a whole
literature evaluating and judging Einstein's work as being less original
than most people accept. Once I started to google on this and you'll find
a lot. On the newsgroup: news.answers there was once a FAQ on Einstein's
works, too, also documenting and questioning his works. Again, it is not
an area I am interested in, but a lot of other people have done a lot of
work on this.

More below....

Poincarre was a
> mathematician, dealing with topology issues. Einstein's main bungling
> lay in his first postulate for SR, meaning that the speed of light is
> invariant with respect to the speed of its emitter. It was the
> Lorentz transformation that he employed, in getting his e=mcc and
> other stuff such as mass becoming infinite at c, length becoming zero
> at c - not apparently but really-really. It is for presenting what is
> apparent as real, that he totally corrupted science and reduced it to
> the level of shopkeeping. As you know, people pay for perceived
> worth, not actual worth.
>
> Anyway, back to natural issues. Spent the evening with Bertiedoggie,
> throwing stones in the local ponds, and watched ducks swimming in
> water, more closely than ever before. Wasn't too sure, till in one
> glorious moment one duck sort of half-raised itself from the water,
> flapping its wings. It also pushed back water with its webbed feet.
> Created thus a big wave rippling all around, and I was thrilled to
> find it go faster to the duck's rear, than the front... Proved
> vel(thete) = V+v(theta), what a glorious example. Will write a poem
> about it.

I think I'm going to write a poem about net scum, such as Mr. Mahaharaj,
if we could only use--in some way--all that spam he generates?

straydoggie

> Best regards,
> Arindam Banerjee.
>
From: Arindam Banerjee on 29 Mar 2010 08:19
On Mar 29, 11:01 pm, "Me, ...again!" <arthu...(a)mv.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 6:25 pm, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
> > <australia.mining-pion...(a)neuf.fr> wrote:
> >> On Mar 29, 2:37 am, "harmony" <a...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> "Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times"<australia.mining-pion...(a)neuf.fr> wrote in message
>
> >>>news:4e2f6ae8-7977-4c54-83cc-0d1178237857(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com....
> >>> On Mar 12, 1:43 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Mar 11, 9:07 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> >>>  Arindam Banerjee
>
> >>> *> Your Mathematician Woof Woof friend is disinterested in you total
> >>> *> triump over Einstein on Usenet, it looks.
>
> >>> Einstein was a well documented Intellectual Thief,  at the same
> >>> underground level as Pasteur & Jenner by the way.
> >>> Mr Arindam Banerjee is certainly right in debugging such Fraud !
> >>> Honour be paid to Mr Banerjee here !
>
> >>> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
> >>> Founder of the True Geology
>
> >>> -------------------------
> >>> could you back it up with proof.
>
> >> Dear Harmony,
>
> >> Mr Banerjee has all the proofs needed. I can provide some more if
> >> needed. E = Mc² understanding was developed by Henri Poincarré for a
> >> start ( and stolen by Einstein) , and as well Mr Poincarré corrected
> >> Einstein math at Nancy, where Einstein went specially for it.
> >> Best regards jpturcaud- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Dear Jean-Paul,
>
> > I am not sure what Einstein stole from Poincarre.
>
> Hi Arindam (and anyone else similarly interested),
>
> I have seen the titles of many books, and saw one book at a library, all
> questioning Einstein's contributions as "borrowings" from contributions of
> earlier workers. I am not an expert at this, but, yes. there is a whole
> literature evaluating and judging Einstein's work as being less original
> than most people accept. Once I started to google on this and you'll find
> a lot. On the newsgroup: news.answers there was once a FAQ on Einstein's
> works, too, also documenting and questioning his works. Again, it is not
> an area I am interested in, but a lot of other people have done a lot of
> work on this.
>
> More below....
>
>    Poincarre was a
>
>
>
>
>
> > mathematician, dealing with topology issues.  Einstein's main bungling
> > lay in his first postulate for SR, meaning that the speed of light is
> > invariant with respect to the speed of its emitter.  It was the
> > Lorentz transformation that he employed, in getting his e=mcc and
> > other stuff such as mass becoming infinite at c, length becoming zero
> > at c - not apparently but really-really.  It is for presenting what is
> > apparent as real, that he totally corrupted science and reduced it to
> > the level of shopkeeping.  As you know, people pay for perceived
> > worth, not actual worth.
>
> > Anyway, back to natural issues.  Spent the evening with Bertiedoggie,
> > throwing stones in the local ponds, and watched ducks swimming in
> > water, more closely than ever before.  Wasn't too sure, till in one
> > glorious moment one duck sort of half-raised itself from the water,
> > flapping its wings.  It also pushed back water with its webbed feet.
> > Created thus a big wave rippling all around, and I was thrilled to
> > find it go faster to the duck's rear, than the front... Proved
> > vel(thete) = V+v(theta), what a glorious example.  Will write a poem
> > about it.
>
> I think I'm going to write a poem about net scum, such as Mr. Mahaharaj,
> if we could only use--in some way--all that spam he generates?

No need, rhyming is so easy.

Tell me, dear doggie, ain't it rum
How the choicest of the net scum
Blasts the stink from its tum
So that none may near it come?
None good, that is; some
Are fools, to heed that bum.
Too much rot, that's the sum
Of the jBm's keyboard's thrum.


>
> straydoggie
>
>
>
> > Best regards,
> > Arindam Banerjee.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: Marshall on 29 Mar 2010 10:08
On Mar 29, 5:19 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> Tell me, dear doggie, ain't it rum
> How the choicest of the net scum
> Blasts the stink from its tum
> So that none may near it come?
> None good, that is; some
> Are fools, to heed that bum.
> Too much rot, that's the sum
> Of the jBm's keyboard's thrum.

I like your poetry every bit as much as I like you science!
It's just as good!


Marshall
From: Myself,PresentContinuouslyTenseMallu on 29 Mar 2010 11:25
On 3/29/2010 5:19 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
> No need, rhyming is so easy.
>
> Tell me, dear doggie, ain't it rum
> How the choicest of the net scum
> Blasts the stink from its tum
> So that none may near it come?
> None good, that is; some
> Are fools, to heed that bum.
> Too much rot, that's the sum
> Of the jBm's keyboard's thrum.
>

Indeed rhyming is easy, dear Arindam
Your poem is the standard minimum.
It'd be funny if recited in helium,
After you'd taken your dose of lithium,
And your readers were in a fog of opium
Or perhaps on its tincture in laudanum.
For all your 'new physics' summum bonum,
Alas, there's the actinide Einsteinium,
And no element named Poincarium,
Or Newtonium, or Maxwellium, or Arindium.

From: Arindam Banerjee on 29 Mar 2010 21:03
On Mar 30, 1:08 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 5:19 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Tell me, dear doggie, ain't it rum
> > How the choicest of the net scum
> > Blasts the stink from its tum
> > So that none may near it come?
> > None good, that is; some
> > Are fools, to heed that bum.
> > Too much rot, that's the sum
> > Of the jBm's keyboard's thrum.
>
> I like your poetry every bit as much as I like you science!
> It's just as good!
>
> Marshall

Wow, thanks a lot! Great to have appreciation! Now, shall we throw
out the wrong notions of relativity from the textbooks? Please,
please...
As for my poetry, I have only had few opportunities to recite them in
public. My friend and partner Ilya (the well-known poet, philosopher
and translator) has been most eager, but distances here are too great.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: 'Instantaneous action at a distance'
Next: Hubble's expanding universe