From: Pollux on
Just wondering if there is a "nice" way to prove Vandermonde's identity
by playing with Pochhammer symbols. Looked for identities involving
Pochhammer symbols, but didn't managed to use those to prove
Vandermonde's identity.

From: Francois Grondin on

"Pollux" <po.lux(a)gmail.com> a ecrit dans le message de news:
hvoml4$fpk$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> Just wondering if there is a "nice" way to prove Vandermonde's identity
> by playing with Pochhammer symbols. Looked for identities involving
> Pochhammer symbols, but didn't managed to use those to prove
> Vandermonde's identity.
>

The simplest way to demonstrate Vandermonde's identity is to start from
(1-z)^(-a-b) = (1-z)^(-a) (1-z)^(-b). Express this last identity in series,
knowing that :

1. (1-z)^(-a) = Hypergeometric1F0(a; z) = sum_k=0^infinity (Pochhammer(a, k)
x^k / k!)
2. sum_k=0^infinity (sum_n=0^infinity f(k, n)) = sum_k=0^infinity (sum_n=0^k
f(k, k-n)) .

Compare the coefficients of z^n to get the desired result. Of course,
you'll have to play with some properties of the Pochhammer symbol to reach
the result.

I don't know if there is another way to obtain it without comparing
coefficients of z^n.

Francois


From: Pollux on
(6/22/10 5:10 AM), Francois Grondin wrote:
> "Pollux"<po.lux(a)gmail.com> a ecrit dans le message de news:
> hvoml4$fpk$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> Just wondering if there is a "nice" way to prove Vandermonde's identity
>> by playing with Pochhammer symbols. Looked for identities involving
>> Pochhammer symbols, but didn't managed to use those to prove
>> Vandermonde's identity.
>>
>
> The simplest way to demonstrate Vandermonde's identity is to start from
> (1-z)^(-a-b) = (1-z)^(-a) (1-z)^(-b). Express this last identity in series,
> knowing that :
>
> 1. (1-z)^(-a) = Hypergeometric1F0(a; z) = sum_k=0^infinity (Pochhammer(a, k)
> x^k / k!)
> 2. sum_k=0^infinity (sum_n=0^infinity f(k, n)) = sum_k=0^infinity (sum_n=0^k
> f(k, k-n)) .
>
> Compare the coefficients of z^n to get the desired result. Of course,
> you'll have to play with some properties of the Pochhammer symbol to reach
> the result.
>
> I don't know if there is another way to obtain it without comparing
> coefficients of z^n.
>
> Francois
>
>
Thanks! Is there a reference where I can find identities for the
Pochhammer symbols? I know they are related to the Gamma. Is it helpful
to replace the Pochammer symbols with ratio of Gamma and work with the
properties of the Gamma?

Thanks again.
From: Francois Grondin on

"Pollux" <po.lux(a)gmail.com> a ecrit dans le message de news:
hvqjou$ptk$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> (6/22/10 5:10 AM), Francois Grondin wrote:
>> "Pollux"<po.lux(a)gmail.com> a ecrit dans le message de news:
>> hvoml4$fpk$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>> Just wondering if there is a "nice" way to prove Vandermonde's identity
>>> by playing with Pochhammer symbols. Looked for identities involving
>>> Pochhammer symbols, but didn't managed to use those to prove
>>> Vandermonde's identity.
>>>
>>
>> The simplest way to demonstrate Vandermonde's identity is to start from
>> (1-z)^(-a-b) = (1-z)^(-a) (1-z)^(-b). Express this last identity in
>> series,
>> knowing that :
>>
>> 1. (1-z)^(-a) = Hypergeometric1F0(a; z) = sum_k=0^infinity (Pochhammer(a,
>> k)
>> x^k / k!)
>> 2. sum_k=0^infinity (sum_n=0^infinity f(k, n)) = sum_k=0^infinity
>> (sum_n=0^k
>> f(k, k-n)) .
>>
>> Compare the coefficients of z^n to get the desired result. Of course,
>> you'll have to play with some properties of the Pochhammer symbol to
>> reach
>> the result.
>>
>> I don't know if there is another way to obtain it without comparing
>> coefficients of z^n.
>>
>> Francois
>>
>>
> Thanks! Is there a reference where I can find identities for the
> Pochhammer symbols? I know they are related to the Gamma. Is it helpful
> to replace the Pochammer symbols with ratio of Gamma and work with the
> properties of the Gamma?
>
> Thanks again.

Hi.

You should have a look at Wolfram site
(http://functions.wolfram.com/GammaBetaErf/Pochhammer/) as first reference.
If you look for a book, I'd suggest "Special Functions" from E.D. Rainville,
New York: Chelsea, 1971. You may also have a look at "Generalized
Hypergeometric Functions" written by L.J. Slater (Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press, 1966). In this last book, there is an extensive
list of properties for the Pochhammer symbol. This should help.

Regards.

Francois


From: Pollux on

Thanks a lot for the references.