From: Milhouse Van Houten on 7 Jul 2010 17:31 Hi Merv, http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs&tid=18bf4b8f-fcd1-4bc7-a079-26a7444938ae&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1 Do you remember that old thread? I have the same problem as SolveIT, and like him, TSAppCompat is already at 0. However, later on he revealed that TSEnabled=1 solved the problem for him, to which you replied "Now if we can just figure out how TSENabled got set to 0 in the first place." Ours is 0 as well -- but isn't that the default? Can you check on your SBS2003 system please? I'll change it to 1 if that's correct, but the best I can find is that 0 is the default. Anything to solve this problem, though. Thanks
From: Chris Puckett [MSFT] on 8 Jul 2010 11:09 TSEnabled will be set to 0 if Terminal Services has been disabled. TSEnabled - Indicates whether Terminal Services is enabled or not. Type: REG_DWORD Data value: 0x1 Enabled Data value: 0x0 Disabled There are two ways I can think of to do this in the UI (looks like it may require a reboot for the change in the registry to take place) 1. Start - Admin Tools - Terminal Services Configuration - Connections - Right-click RDP-TCP and go to All Tasks- Disable. 2. Properties of My Computer - Remote tab - Uncheck 'enable remote desktop...' -- Chris Puckett This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Milhouse Van Houten" <btvs(a)myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:#3$BMvhHLHA.1016(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Hi Merv, > > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs&tid=18bf4b8f-fcd1-4bc7-a079-26a7444938ae&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1 > > Do you remember that old thread? I have the same problem as SolveIT, and > like him, TSAppCompat is already at 0. > > However, later on he revealed that TSEnabled=1 solved the problem for him, > to which you replied "Now if we can just figure out how TSENabled > got set to 0 in the first place." > > Ours is 0 as well -- but isn't that the default? Can you check on your > SBS2003 system please? I'll change it to 1 if that's correct, but the > best I can find is that 0 is the default. Anything to solve this problem, > though. > > Thanks
From: Al Williams on 8 Jul 2010 11:11 On our SBS 2003 SP2 TSAppCompat=0 and TSEnabled=1 so I would change TSEnabled to 1 and reboot. -- Allan Williams Milhouse Van Houten wrote: > Hi Merv, > > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs&tid=18bf4b8f-fcd1-4bc7-a079-26a7444938ae&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1 > > Do you remember that old thread? I have the same problem as SolveIT, > and like him, TSAppCompat is already at 0. > > However, later on he revealed that TSEnabled=1 solved the problem for > him, to which you replied "Now if we can just figure out how TSENabled > got set to 0 in the first place." > > Ours is 0 as well -- but isn't that the default? Can you check on > your SBS2003 system please? I'll change it to 1 if that's correct, > but the best I can find is that 0 is the default. Anything to solve > this problem, though. > Thanks
From: Milhouse Van Houten on 10 Jul 2010 02:34 Yes, TSEnabled most definitely should be on 1, and it is the default, which is not exactly the easiest thing to determine without asking. Wonky things happen to the UI if either it or the other one is flipped. It's unfortunate that we inadvertently did just that to one of them. Thanks. "Al Williams" wrote in message news:O6#FK$qHLHA.5892(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... On our SBS 2003 SP2 TSAppCompat=0 and TSEnabled=1 so I would change TSEnabled to 1 and reboot. -- Allan Williams Milhouse Van Houten wrote: > Hi Merv, > > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs&tid=18bf4b8f-fcd1-4bc7-a079-26a7444938ae&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1 > > Do you remember that old thread? I have the same problem as SolveIT, > and like him, TSAppCompat is already at 0. > > However, later on he revealed that TSEnabled=1 solved the problem for > him, to which you replied "Now if we can just figure out how TSENabled > got set to 0 in the first place." > > Ours is 0 as well -- but isn't that the default? Can you check on > your SBS2003 system please? I'll change it to 1 if that's correct, > but the best I can find is that 0 is the default. Anything to solve > this problem, though. > Thanks
|
Pages: 1 Prev: SBS 2008 - views on virtualization Next: IE on Server2003 hosed by hotfix |