From: TW on 13 Apr 2010 18:08 A proper sysrpl/ML debugger would get my vote. TW
From: Andreas Möller on 14 Apr 2010 02:46 > A proper sysrpl/ML debugger would get my vote. You know how much work this is going to be ;-) Probably a lot more than what I would consider "ittle spare time" ... Regards, Andreas http://www.software49g.gmxhome.de
From: Andreas Möller on 14 Apr 2010 02:58 Hello, > A circuit simulator is a very challenging project, but this program is > really necessary. I would be willing to pay 50 :) ! Since EEpro for the 50G is probably never going to be released, I could produce a dataset of equations (from the TI manual, I do not think that anybody has a copyright on Ohm´s Law) so that at least the equation functionallity of EEpro will be back for the 50G. If translators can be found this database could also be translated to Spanish, French or whatever. A circuit simulator would be a second step. This will be a huge task as there are a *lot* of equations to port which is cumbersome and time consuming. For reading/using the dataset you would need the TB which is not free but is not very expensive as the email version ( 20 including the translation) and allows a lot of additional stuff on the 50G. What do you think ? Regards, Andreas http://www.software49g.gmxhome.de
From: Andreas Möller on 14 Apr 2010 03:02 > A proper sysrpl/ML debugger would get my vote. You know how much work this is going to be ;-) Probably a lot more than what I would consider "a little spare time" ... Regards, Andreas http://www.software49g.gmxhome.de
From: Dave Hayden on 14 Apr 2010 06:52
On Apr 13, 6:08 pm, TW <timwess...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A proper sysrpl/ML debugger would get my vote. I'm curious why? It seems to me that tools like this are much better suited for a desktop system that uses an emulator or a cable to calculator. Dave |