Pornography: The secret history of civilization
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: California Poppy Reserve
Next: [photos] Morocco
From: sobriquet on 27 Apr 2010 11:32 On 27 apr, 17:25, Robert Spanjaard <spamt...(a)arumes.com> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:52:59 -0400, Peter wrote: > > Why even bother. He gets paid for what he does, > > Nope. He's a parasite in every possible way. > > -- > Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com You're a nazi cockroach in every possible way.
From: Twibil on 27 Apr 2010 14:51 On Apr 27, 7:27 am, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >> thief > > > > nazi > > > nope, far, far from it. just honest. > > ok.. an honest nazi cockroach. I appreciate your honesty. Nope. You really don't understand. (And don't *want* to understand, either.) "Thief" is an accurate description of someone who steals something that doesn't belong to them, I.E. you. "Nazi" used as you're using it is only an insult that has no connection to reality. So in fact you *are* a thief, he's *not* a "Nazi", and you're simply flinging random syllables in hopes of dragging him down to your level. It didn't work.
From: sobriquet on 27 Apr 2010 15:08 On 27 apr, 20:51, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 7:27 am, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> thief > > > > > nazi > > > > nope, far, far from it. just honest. > > > ok.. an honest nazi cockroach. I appreciate your honesty. > > Nope. You really don't understand. (And don't *want* to understand, > either.) > > "Thief" is an accurate description of someone who steals something > that doesn't belong to them, I.E. you. Stealing means to take something away in a way that violates ownership. This is not possible for things that belong to the public domain. You can't take a bitstring away and when people infringe copyrights by exchanging bitstrings, they don't take anything away. There merely duplicate and exchange bitstrings. When they infringe copyrights, they ignore spurious intellectual property claims regarding bitstrings. The fact that corporations claim to own things like bitstrings or DNA sequences is incontrovertible evidence of the fact that the government in countries like the USA is a mere extension of corporations, rather than an organization that is supposed to guarantee human rights. > > "Nazi" used as you're using it is only an insult that has no > connection to reality. > > So in fact you *are* a thief, he's *not* a "Nazi", and you're simply > flinging random syllables in hopes of dragging him down to your level. > > It didn't work. 'Nazi' is a word I reserve for people who display a blatant disrespect for human rights by falsely accusing them of theft when they infringe copyrights or by falsely claiming the superiority of their race or outlook on things and the inferiority of people who have a different racial background, a different lifestyle or dissenting opinion.
From: sobriquet on 27 Apr 2010 15:23 On 27 apr, 21:08, sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > You can't take a bitstring away and when people infringe copyrights by > exchanging bitstrings, they don't take anything away. They merely > duplicate and exchange bitstrings. Typo corrected in the last sentence for clarity.
From: John McWilliams on 27 Apr 2010 19:22
sobriquet wrote: > On 27 apr, 20:51, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> So in fact you *are* a thief, he's *not* a "Nazi", and you're simply >> flinging random syllables in hopes of dragging him down to your level. Bingo! >> >> It didn't work. He won't see that..... > > 'Nazi' is a word I reserve for people who display a blatant disrespect > for human rights by falsely accusing them of theft when they infringe > copyrights Incorrect usage. > or by falsely claiming the superiority of their race or > outlook on things and the inferiority of people who have a different > racial background, a different lifestyle or dissenting opinion. That's more like it. But, really, it's usually wannabe Nazi's that throw the word around. -- lsmft |