Port installing localized manual pages.
in [Ports]
|
From: Ashish SHUKLA on 17 Jul 2010 11:26 Hi, Recently I've got the chance of playing with a port[1] which installs localized manual pages :). For the locales of manual pages, I removed the lines from pkg-plist corresponding to manual pages and their corresponding '@dirrmtry' and added following lines: #v+ MAN1= qelectrotech.1 MANLANG= "" es fr.ISO8859-1 fr.UTF-8 fr pt_PT MANCOMPRESSED= yes #v- This worked great and the man pages were recorded as expected, but tinderbox resulted in: #v+ list of extra files and directories in / (not present on clean system but present after everything was deinstalled) 1110986 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1 1110987 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1/man1 1110989 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8 1110990 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8/man1 1110993 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT 1110994 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT/man1 #v- What do you say ? Should I add '@dirrmtry' corresponding to above manual directories ? Or, for all manual directories ? Or just ignore the warning ? References: [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513 TiA -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 freebsd.org!ashish | http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ âThere is nothing new to be discovered in physics now; All that remains is more and more precise measurement.â (Lord Kelvin, 1900)
From: Anonymous on 17 Jul 2010 13:04 ashish(a)FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: [...] > #v+ > list of extra files and directories in / (not present on clean system but present after everything was deinstalled) > 1110986 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1 > 1110987 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1/man1 > 1110989 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8 > 1110990 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8/man1 > 1110993 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT > 1110994 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT/man1 > #v- > > What do you say ? Should I add '@dirrmtry' corresponding to above manual > directories ? Or, for all manual directories ? Or just ignore the warning ? I'd add @dirrmtry only for those that are not in mtree, e.g. $ mtree -f $(make -V MTREE_FILE) -p $(make -V PREFIX) > > References: > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513 Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Ashish SHUKLA on 17 Jul 2010 21:40 Anonymous writes: > ashish(a)FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: > [...] >> #v+ >> list of extra files and directories in / (not present on clean system but present after everything was deinstalled) >> 1110986 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1 >> 1110987 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.ISO8859-1/man1 >> 1110989 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8 >> 1110990 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/fr.UTF-8/man1 >> 1110993 3 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT >> 1110994 3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Jul 17 12:40 usr/local/man/pt_PT/man1 >> #v- >> >> What do you say ? Should I add '@dirrmtry' corresponding to above manual >> directories ? Or, for all manual directories ? Or just ignore the warning ? > I'd add @dirrmtry only for those that are not in mtree, e.g. > $ mtree -f $(make -V MTREE_FILE) -p $(make -V PREFIX) AFAICS, those are the only directories not present in MTREE_FILE, which is why Tinderbox complained of their presence. >> >> References: >> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513 > Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract? I added because specifying '${WRKSRC}/LICENSE' as 'LICENSE_FILE' results in a conflict because License infrastructure in ports system also creates a file named LICENSE. So, I'm just copying it to some name other than LICENSE, and than mentioning that in the LICENSE_FILE. Thanks -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 freebsd.org!ashish | http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ âThey that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.â (Benjamin Franklin)
From: Ashish SHUKLA on 17 Jul 2010 22:25 Ashish SHUKLA writes: [...] > than mentioning that in the LICENSE_FILE. s/than/then/ -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 freebsd.org!ashish | http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ âIn three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life â It goes on.â (Robert Frost)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: General note on rc scripts and daemonizing Next: Fakeroot for ports new round |