Positioning of DIV - IE and FIrefox Zoom issues
in [CSS]
|
Prev: Input Data Sheet
Next: Free sms site launched
From: dorayme on 7 Sep 2009 20:03 In article <h833oc$5va$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art(a)centralva.net> wrote: > dorayme wrote: > > In article <h822cr$mfs$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > > "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art(a)centralva.net> wrote: > > > >> dorayme wrote: > >>> In article <h80omi$d50$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > >>> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art(a)centralva.net> wrote: > > ... > >>> I think you > >>> should take up more of my offers for investment in my business schemes, > >>> that I kindly first make to alt.htmlers now and then. <g> > >>> > >> Which schemes and how would that improve the lack of broadband here? > > > > The idea is this. You invest in my inventions - like the keyboard that > > is also a big mouse (it sits on wheels for the el cheapo version and > > optical bottom for the de lux one, it will be called The Cat) - and you > > get filthy rich. You get to afford better satellite plan. > > > If I were to get filthy rich I'd buy my own fiber connection and drop > satellite in a heartbeat. Well that is entirely up to you! Why bother with all those messy lines, you would have your own satellite (with servers on board for upload) positioned right above you and whatever.... > BTW is this design inline with Mr Job's loathing of buttons so that the > keyboard|mouse thingy would only sport one single mega key|button? It is and it is not, depends on how you want to think of it. You PCers and other fans of multi-buttoned mice can think of it as having over 100 keys, others can think of it as having just one button or indeed as being buttonless. Look, Jonathan, I can't send out an official prospectus at this moment in time, but stop hesitating so... -- dorayme
From: John Hosking on 8 Sep 2009 02:55 On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:26:18 -0400, jeff wrote: > John Hosking wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:07:17 -0400, jeff wrote...: >> >>> Jeff >> >> [246 lines of unnecessarily posted code, unnecessarily quoted by somebody >> who ought to know better, snipped by myself] >> >> Jeff, again, would you *please* stop doing that? TRIM what you're not >> responding to, for crying out loud. >> > > I don't need this. > > I've unsubscribed. > > Jeff I'm sincerely sorry to see this. I didn't think a third request inside of four months (to follow commonly accepted netiquette) would cause such a violent reaction. Now another usenetter has departed, taking his useful contributions with him. Maybe usenet has become so barren that I've become the biggest jerk left here. :-( -- John My mother would be so proud.
From: William Gill on 8 Sep 2009 11:50 John Hosking wrote: > Maybe usenet has become so barren that I've become the biggest jerk left > here. :-( Not to worry John, there are much bigger jerks here. :-) -- Bill
From: dorayme on 8 Sep 2009 18:32
In article <W2vpm.32823$Y83.13442(a)newsfe21.iad>, William Gill <nospam(a)domain.invalid> wrote: > John Hosking wrote: > > Maybe usenet has become so barren that I've become the biggest jerk left > > here. :-( > Not to worry John, there are much bigger jerks here. :-) Hey! What are you implying? -- dorayme |