Prev: improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads
Next: a perf and some sched patches
From: Romain Kubany on 18 Dec 2009 08:40 Hello Sorry, some kind of emergency occured and I didn't had the time to answer your mails Jeff : No change were made to the VM configuration between the two kernel (2.6.27.41 & 2.6.28) so it is unlikely the disk himself or the VM configuration which are provoking this behavior. Also, not this virtual machine in particular but others (with the same hardware configuration) are running Windows 2003/2008 without that limitation to 136Gb. Bartlomiej : Ok, here is the dmesg of a 2.6.32.1 (http://pastebin.com/f3645803b ) and here is the output of a 'hdparm --Istdout /dev/sda' (under 2.6.32) as you suggested : # hdparm --Istdout /dev/sda /dev/sda: 045a 3fff 0000 0010 fe00 0200 003f abcd dcba 0123 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0003 0080 0000 312e 312e 3020 2020 5669 7274 7561 6c20 4844 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 8080 0000 0f00 0000 0200 0200 0003 ffff 0010 00ff f010 0fef 0180 f010 0fef 0007 0407 0003 0078 0078 014d 0078 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0400 0000 0000 0400 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1900 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 -----Message d'origine----- De�: linux-kernel-owner(a)vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner(a)vger.kernel.org] De la part de Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Envoy�: jeudi 17 d�cembre 2009 14:34 ��: Jeff Garzik Cc�: Romain Kubany; Mikael Pettersson; linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org; linux-ide(a)vger.kernel.org Objet�: Re: Possible regression of LBA48 support for piix On Thursday 17 December 2009 01:22:22 pm Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 12/17/2009 07:07 AM, Romain Kubany wrote: > > Here it is under the 2.6.28 : > > > > # hdparm -I /dev/sda > > > > /dev/sda: > > > > ATA device, with non-removable media > > Model Number: Virtual HD > > Serial Number: > > Firmware Revision: 1.1.0 > > Standards: > > Likely used: 2 > > Configuration: > > Logical max current > > cylinders 16383 65535 > > heads 16 16 > > sectors/track 63 255 > > -- > > bytes/track: 65024 bytes/sector: 512 > > CHS current addressable sectors: 267382800 > > LBA user addressable sectors: 267382800 > > device size with M = 1024*1024: 130558 MBytes > > device size with M = 1000*1000: 136899 MBytes (136 GB) > > Yeah, that info is straight from the virtual disk, without any sort of > massaging. The disk is reporting 136GB max, so I would poke around > Windows to see if a setting changed somewhere... maybe there is an "old > IDE compatible" setting that got turned on, for the virtual hd? It is also possible that this virtual disk has never worked with ata_piix driver and worked with piix driver in the older kernels because of pure luck. In 2.6.28 I've fixed LBA48 checks in IDE to match libata (see commit 942dcd8 for details) so it would be worth to try: - simulating the older buggy IDE behavior with 2.6.32 kernel or - staring long enough at 'hdparm --Istdout /dev/sda' output first. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads Next: a perf and some sched patches |