PostgreSQL 8.5 Open Items
in [PgSql]
|
From: Andres Freund on 7 Jan 2010 15:07 On Thursday 07 January 2010 20:58:10 Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > Are there > > really no other open issues for 8.5? That would be great, but I am > > concerned that there may be other things that people just haven't > > gotten around to mentioning yet. > > Well, there's still a number of items on the Hot Standby TODO list. > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hot_Standby_TODO > > As everyone who has followed the discussions know by now, I also > consider the inability to start hot standby from a shutdown checkpoint > as a must-fix issue. I do as well. What exactly where the problems (beside Simon seemingly disliking it) with the solution you proposed some time ago? Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian on 7 Jan 2010 16:03 Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items? I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as open. I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 7 Jan 2010 17:18 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items? > > I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as > open. I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment. I am totally confused. This is exactly what we went through with 8.4. We really need to finalize the list of items as soon as possible. Of course it may get added to later, but as long as it exists only in your email nobody else can work on it. It seems like you're asking us to hold up the release until you have time to sort through your email, and then as much time after that as it takes to address whatever you may find in the process of going through it. That doesn't seem very reasonable. Maybe that wasn't your intent? ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Peter Eisentraut on 7 Jan 2010 17:35 On tor, 2010-01-07 at 17:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Bruce, > >> > >> Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items? > > > > I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as > > open. I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment. > > I am totally confused. This is exactly what we went through with 8.4. > We really need to finalize the list of items as soon as possible. Of > course it may get added to later, but as long as it exists only in > your email nobody else can work on it. It seems like you're asking us > to hold up the release until you have time to sort through your email, It sounded more like you asking Bruce whether he would like to hold up the release. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian on 7 Jan 2010 17:41 Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Bruce, > >> > >> Have you looked at this? ?Are there no other Open Items? > > > > I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as > > open. ?I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment. > > I am totally confused. This is exactly what we went through with 8.4. > We really need to finalize the list of items as soon as possible. Of > course it may get added to later, but as long as it exists only in > your email nobody else can work on it. It seems like you're asking us > to hold up the release until you have time to sort through your email, > and then as much time after that as it takes to address whatever you > may find in the process of going through it. That doesn't seem very > reasonable. Maybe that wasn't your intent? It's my mailbox --- it is my time to decide when to look at it, or not. There is nothing private about its contents. You can do whatever you want with the release schedule. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: [HACKERS] advantage of new vacuum Next: tsvector extraction patch |