From: Frederick Williams on
Bill Dubuque wrote:
>
> Frederick Williams <frederick.williams2(a)tesco.net> wrote:
> > "W. eWatson" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/11/2010 10:41 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:
> > > > "W. eWatson" wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I use Tbird for mail, is there some way to post msgs with math symbols?
> > > >
> > > > Use TeX sans the \ and $.
> > > >
> > > Are you saying that TeX (I know a very tiny amount about it) will
> > > translate math expressions into ASCII.
> >
> > No, I'm saying that if you want to mention the intersection of set X and
> > Y, don't write
> >
> > $X \cap Y$,
> >
> > write
> >
> > X cap Y.
>
> Imho X /\ Y is better.

In that case one has a clear alternative, but I'm sure we can both think
of mathematical symbols that don't have simple ASCII renderings.

--
I can't go on, I'll go on.
From: Bill Dubuque on
Frederick Williams <frederick.williams2(a)tesco.net> wrote:
> Bill Dubuque wrote:
>> Frederick Williams <frederick.williams2(a)tesco.net> wrote:
>>> "W. eWatson" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/11/2010 10:41 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:
>>>>> "W. eWatson" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I use Tbird for mail, is there some way to post msgs with math symbols?
>>>>>
>>>>> Use TeX sans the \ and $.
>>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that TeX (I know a very tiny amount about it) will
>>>> translate math expressions into ASCII.
>>>
>>> No, I'm saying that if you want to mention the intersection of set X and
>>> Y, don't write
>>>
>>> $X \cap Y$,
>>>
>>> write
>>>
>>> X cap Y.
>>
>> Imho X /\ Y is better.
>
> In that case one has a clear alternative, but I'm sure we can both think
> of mathematical symbols that don't have simple ASCII renderings.

But I can't think of any where the TeX form is better than prior ascii forms.