Prev: Swapping Partitions
Next: My Monitor Has a Halo
From: RnR on 1 Feb 2010 07:59 On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:58:53 -0600, "William R. Walsh" <newsgroups1(a)idontwantjunqueemail.walshcomptech.com> wrote: >Hi! > >> To my knowledge Dell's cpu is an altered retail version and nothing I >> ever read over the years said it was clockable. > >That's true of *any* late model Intel CPU, as used by Dell or otherwise. The >multiplier is locked, and there goes your fun. It's been that way since the >Pentium III. Dell doesn't get any special processors that you couldn't get >yourself. Only pre-release and "development" processors from Intel have >unlocked multipliers. > >What you can do to get around this is to crank up the FSB speed. That >involves programming the clock generator to multiply its base clock at a >different (usually higher) rate. This tends to increase the pace of >everything in the system, from the bus, memory and the unmultiplied base >clock of the microprocessor. > >If you can get enough information about the clock generator in use to >program it, it doesn't matter what options the BIOS offers (or doesn't). You >can try programming it to speed things up, thereby overclocking "on the >fly". SpeedFan supports programming some clock generators (mostly to >downclock and therefore save power when the PC is idle). Other software can >also do this. > >Since not everything will run acceptably when running at an increased speed, >it is sometimes needed to crank up the voltages (for memory, as an example), >add wait states or change the clock ratio of the PCI bus to the base clock >so there is more "wait time" per cycle. > >> Second, I hope you are right on "not that easy to kill". I feel for >> bad for this neighbor but sometimes the hard lessons do teach us >> well. > >They're not that easy to kill in most cases. Pushing the clock rate up too >far can crash the system, but it shouldn't break anything permanently. It's >playing with the core voltages that can cause problems if the BIOS setup >utility (or other control software) will allow them to set to insane values. >That is what burns hardware when overclocking goes wrong. > >Sounds like they got it working again anyway, so good for them. Hopefully >they will be a bit more conservative if they elect to continue. > >William > Thanks William. A quick Google checked confirmed what you said. I guess I'm not up to speed on overclocking. I did it many years ago but have no interest to do it again nowadays. Appreciate the education. |