From: Tom Shelton on 3 Mar 2010 08:20 On 2010-03-03, Marc Hillman <7owsx1j02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: > Success Tom - thanks a million. Did not need the "dim bufferptr as intptr = > marshal.ReadIntPtr(strPtr)" statement." IntPtr is new to me, as is Marshal, > but I think I understand enough to fix all the other similar issues. Ok... cool. I wasn't sure if you needed that either. The documentation was a bit cloudy and I don't know pascal all that well - so I wasn't sure if the return was a pointer-to-pointer (which is what I assumed and why I had the readintptr) or just a pointer. I'm glad you figured it out though :) -- Tom Shelton
From: Mark Hurd on 15 Mar 2010 20:13 "Marc Hillman" <7owsx1j02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:uvXn9iquKHA.5812(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Success Tom - thanks a million. Did not need the "dim bufferptr as > intptr = marshal.ReadIntPtr(strPtr)" statement." IntPtr is new to me, > as is Marshal, but I think I understand enough to fix all the other > similar issues. > > I still don't understand why 'simple' version of the code work with > String types, but it's great to finally have a solution. Thanks again. > > It never ceases to amaze me the number of people who willingly help > others for no obvious reward. The only reward we normally look for is a final post explaining the exact solution you found. The above doesn't really explain it. :-) -- Regards, Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.) (Hons.)
From: Cor Ligthert[MVP] on 16 Mar 2010 06:59 But for those who help it is very useful. "Mark Hurd" <markhurd(a)ozemail.com.au> wrote in message news:eWWS01JxKHA.1548(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "Marc Hillman" <7owsx1j02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > news:uvXn9iquKHA.5812(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Success Tom - thanks a million. Did not need the "dim bufferptr as intptr >> = marshal.ReadIntPtr(strPtr)" statement." IntPtr is new to me, as is >> Marshal, but I think I understand enough to fix all the other similar >> issues. >> >> I still don't understand why 'simple' version of the code work with >> String types, but it's great to finally have a solution. Thanks again. >> >> It never ceases to amaze me the number of people who willingly help >> others for no obvious reward. > > The only reward we normally look for is a final post explaining the exact > solution you found. The above doesn't really explain it. :-) > > -- > Regards, > Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.) (Hons.) >
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Windows Service Next: Dynamically adding menu items and their OnClick events |