From: Arne Vajhøj on 2 Jan 2010 21:38 On 05-12-2009 00:10, Mike Schilling wrote: > Arne Vajh�j wrote: >> Mike Schilling wrote: >>> Arne Vajh�j wrote: >>>> But I would use log4j instead of something home made. >>> >>> Why log4j rather than java.util.logger? (just curious; I've always >>> used the latter, so have no basis for comparison) >> >> log4j has more features than jul. > > Which ones do you find most useful? Argh. That is what happen when one make statements like that. :-) I like all the appenders that comes with log4j. I like the more advanced configuration options. It can do a lot more. Not particular surprising considering that it has 5-10 times as many classes. Oh - and it performs better as well. Arne |