From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 05-12-2009 00:10, Mike Schilling wrote:
> Arne Vajh�j wrote:
>> Mike Schilling wrote:
>>> Arne Vajh�j wrote:
>>>> But I would use log4j instead of something home made.
>>>
>>> Why log4j rather than java.util.logger? (just curious; I've always
>>> used the latter, so have no basis for comparison)
>>
>> log4j has more features than jul.
>
> Which ones do you find most useful?

Argh. That is what happen when one make statements like that.

:-)

I like all the appenders that comes with log4j.

I like the more advanced configuration options.

It can do a lot more. Not particular surprising
considering that it has 5-10 times as many classes.

Oh - and it performs better as well.

Arne