From: Roger Stafford on
TideMan <mulgor(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <50885f83-7fdc-4db8-8a6e-7644a4332835(a)a2g2000prd.googlegroups.com>...
> You're right, but I only got there after a page of algebra.
> How could I have gotten there without the algebra?
> BTW, the answer I got for the limit is 6/30, correct?
- - - - - - - -
Yes, that's the correct limit, Tideman. (Shashishekar will be grateful to you for spilling the beans. :-) )

Whether it takes a lot of algebra or not depends on whether you already know the fourth identity, which is in fact:

1^4 + 2^4 + 3^4 + 4^4 + ... + (n-1)^4 = (n-1)*n*(2*n-1)*(3*n^2-3*n-1)/30

After that it is all smooth sailing, because the summation satisfies

sum((1-(0:n-1)/(n-1)).^4) = sum(((n-1-(0:n-1))/(n-1)).^4) =
sum((n-1:-1:0).^4)/(n-1)^4 = sum((0:n-1).^4)/(n-1)^4 ,

this last equality being obtained by doing a 'fliplr' which doesn't alter the sum. So, hardly any algebra is needed after that.

My ancient "CRC Standard Mathematical Tables" only gave the summation of powers of i up to cubes, so I'll have to confess it took some algebra on my part to work it out for the fourth power, but I am sure some other tables are floating around which contain that formula.

Roger Stafford
From: TideMan on
On May 11, 10:46 am, "Roger Stafford"
<ellieandrogerxy...(a)mindspring.com.invalid> wrote:
> TideMan <mul...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <50885f83-7fdc-4db8-8a6e-7644a4332...(a)a2g2000prd.googlegroups.com>...
> > You're right, but I only got there after a page of algebra.
> > How could I have gotten there without the algebra?
> > BTW, the answer I got for the limit is 6/30, correct?
>
> - - - - - - - -
>   Yes, that's the correct limit, Tideman.  (Shashishekar will be grateful to you for spilling the beans.  :-)  )
>
>   Whether it takes a lot of algebra or not depends on whether you already know the fourth identity, which is in fact:
>
>  1^4 + 2^4 + 3^4 + 4^4 + ... + (n-1)^4 = (n-1)*n*(2*n-1)*(3*n^2-3*n-1)/30
>
> After that it is all smooth sailing, because the summation satisfies
>
>  sum((1-(0:n-1)/(n-1)).^4) = sum(((n-1-(0:n-1))/(n-1)).^4) =
>  sum((n-1:-1:0).^4)/(n-1)^4 = sum((0:n-1).^4)/(n-1)^4 ,
>
> this last equality being obtained by doing a 'fliplr' which doesn't alter the sum.  So, hardly any algebra is needed after that.
>
>   My ancient "CRC Standard Mathematical Tables" only gave the summation of powers of i up to cubes, so I'll have to confess it took some algebra on my part to work it out for the fourth power, but I am sure some other tables are floating around which contain that formula.
>
> Roger Stafford

Oh, I got the 4th power OK from my 40-year old Gradshteyn & Ryzhik
Table of Integrals Series and Products.
What I wanted to know is how you knew that the first 4 terms cancelled
to just leave just the 4th power sum.
From: Shashishekar on
The problem has been resolved now, It would not have been possible without the help of this forum. Thank you very much for the support