From: keithr on 12 Jun 2010 05:12 David L. Jones wrote: > I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious! > http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/ > > (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans) > > Dave. > Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights.
From: krw on 12 Jun 2010 13:01 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote: >David L. Jones wrote: >> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious! >> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/ >> >> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans) >> >> Dave. >> >Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights. Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 12 Jun 2010 13:31 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:01:01 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote: > >>David L. Jones wrote: >>> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious! >>> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/ >>> >>> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans) >>> >>> Dave. >>> >>Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights. > >Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited. The guy is a total retard because he has no grasp of what the term "co-efficient of friction" means. Try it on a soft mat, retard boy. Also, back in the dial days, did you complain about not being able to turn the dial single-handedly? Or did your mind automatically KNOW that you need to back bias the torque against the base so that you COULD turn the dial with one hand? OK, brainiac, now use that same logic, and figure out how to depress the button without knocking over the meter. Fingers BEHIND the meter, thumb presses the button. Easy, greasy, Japanezy. Yeah... Design FAIL alright. You old man's sperm, and your mother's egg. Result... FAIL... YOU.
From: krw on 12 Jun 2010 14:03 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:31:44 -0700, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:01:01 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote: >> >>>David L. Jones wrote: >>>> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious! >>>> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/ >>>> >>>> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans) >>>> >>>> Dave. >>>> >>>Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights. >> >>Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited. > > The guy is a total retard because he has no grasp of what the term >"co-efficient of friction" means. AlwaysWrong, is wrong, always. > Try it on a soft mat, retard boy. I keep telling you, that YOU ARE NOT MY TYPE. I like intelligent women. Not mommy's li'l hamper divers. > Also, back in the dial days, did you complain about not being able to >turn the dial single-handedly? Or did your mind automatically KNOW that >you need to back bias the torque against the base so that you COULD turn >the dial with one hand? It's a little early to be drunk, DimBulb. > OK, brainiac, now use that same logic, and figure out how to depress >the button without knocking over the meter. Fingers BEHIND the meter, >thumb presses the button. Easy, greasy, Japanezy. Put the bottle down, Dimmie. > Yeah... Design FAIL alright. You old man's sperm, and your mother's >egg. Result... FAIL... YOU. You are an obvious example of a human design failure, AlwaysWrong. Mommy still loves you though, if you wouldn't puke in her hamper.
From: Mr.T on 14 Jun 2010 03:58
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message news:k6f716doqt22qt945ha37pht8c83q6uolm(a)4ax.com... > Oh, AlwaysWrong's reason is obvious. It's a feeble attempt (all DimBulb can > muster) at moving goal posts. Yep, that much is pretty obvious, but I was trying not to sink to his level of personal abuse. MrT. |