From: keithr on
David L. Jones wrote:
> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious!
> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/
>
> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans)
>
> Dave.
>
Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights.
From: krw on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote:

>David L. Jones wrote:
>> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious!
>> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/
>>
>> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans)
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights.

Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited.
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:01:01 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
>>David L. Jones wrote:
>>> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious!
>>> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/
>>>
>>> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans)
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights.
>
>Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited.

The guy is a total retard because he has no grasp of what the term
"co-efficient of friction" means.

Try it on a soft mat, retard boy.

Also, back in the dial days, did you complain about not being able to
turn the dial single-handedly? Or did your mind automatically KNOW that
you need to back bias the torque against the base so that you COULD turn
the dial with one hand?

OK, brainiac, now use that same logic, and figure out how to depress
the button without knocking over the meter. Fingers BEHIND the meter,
thumb presses the button. Easy, greasy, Japanezy.

Yeah... Design FAIL alright. You old man's sperm, and your mother's
egg. Result... FAIL... YOU.
From: krw on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:31:44 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:01:01 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:12:55 +1000, keithr <keith(a)nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>David L. Jones wrote:
>>>> I couldn't help myself, I just found this so hilarious!
>>>> http://www.eevblog.com/2010/06/02/product-design-fail-ideal-multimeter/
>>>>
>>>> (less than 1 minute video for those with short attention spans)
>>>>
>>>> Dave.
>>>>
>>>Hey Dave, you really do seem to have a talent for starting shitfights.
>>
>>Quiet! You're getting AlwaysWrong excited.
>
> The guy is a total retard because he has no grasp of what the term
>"co-efficient of friction" means.

AlwaysWrong, is wrong, always.

> Try it on a soft mat, retard boy.

I keep telling you, that YOU ARE NOT MY TYPE. I like intelligent women. Not
mommy's li'l hamper divers.

> Also, back in the dial days, did you complain about not being able to
>turn the dial single-handedly? Or did your mind automatically KNOW that
>you need to back bias the torque against the base so that you COULD turn
>the dial with one hand?

It's a little early to be drunk, DimBulb.

> OK, brainiac, now use that same logic, and figure out how to depress
>the button without knocking over the meter. Fingers BEHIND the meter,
>thumb presses the button. Easy, greasy, Japanezy.

Put the bottle down, Dimmie.

> Yeah... Design FAIL alright. You old man's sperm, and your mother's
>egg. Result... FAIL... YOU.

You are an obvious example of a human design failure, AlwaysWrong. Mommy
still loves you though, if you wouldn't puke in her hamper.

From: Mr.T on

<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
news:k6f716doqt22qt945ha37pht8c83q6uolm(a)4ax.com...
> Oh, AlwaysWrong's reason is obvious. It's a feeble attempt (all DimBulb
can
> muster) at moving goal posts.

Yep, that much is pretty obvious, but I was trying not to sink to his level
of personal abuse.

MrT.