From: Meteorologist on
Evidence Suggests Man-Made Warming
Greatly Exaggerated, Richard Lindzen

http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2010/04/evidence_suggests_manmade_warm.html

Please discuss or debate fully. I want
to know what usenetters think.

David Christainsen
From: Androcles on

"Meteorologist" <dchristainsen(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:94fbfe75-411f-484e-8acc-f27de8e7580e(a)q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Evidence Suggests Man-Made Warming
> Greatly Exaggerated, Richard Lindzen
>
> http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2010/04/evidence_suggests_manmade_warm.html
>
> Please discuss or debate fully. I want
> to know what usenetters think.
>
> David Christainsen

Most usenetters don't think, and your request shows you don't either.

From: Claudius Denk on
On Apr 12, 12:14 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_x>
wrote:
> "Meteorologist" <dchristain...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:94fbfe75-411f-484e-8acc-f27de8e7580e(a)q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Evidence Suggests Man-Made Warming
> > Greatly Exaggerated, Richard Lindzen
>
> >http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2010/04/evidence_suggests_manma...
>
> > Please discuss or debate fully.  I want
> > to know what usenetters think.
>
> > David Christainsen
>
> Most usenetters don't think, and your request shows you don't either.

LOL.
From: Ouroboros Rex on
On 4/12/2010 1:51 PM, Meteorologist wrote:
> Evidence Suggests Man-Made Warming
> Greatly Exaggerated, Richard Lindzen

Lindzen is a washed up tobacco denialist.
From: Larry on
Meteorologist <dchristainsen(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:94fbfe75-411f-
484e-8acc-f27de8e7580e(a)q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com:

> Please discuss or debate fully. I want
> to know what usenetters think.
>

Brett Anderson must have been an Accuweather meteorologist since he was
4! HE'S JUST A KID!

Prof Lindzen must be one of the most ethical scientists on the planet.
He has stuck to his convictions and research IN SPITE of them waving
millions of dollars in grant money under his nose he could easily just
have by doing what the CRU boys did and give the politicians what they
wanted...global warming for World Government.

However, as a true scientist, much to MIT's credit, money means nothing
compared to proper scientific research and his findings have stood every
test, at great personal sacrifice as he has been vilified in all the
pubs.

Lindzen reminds me of Peter Duesberg, whos career has been mostly ruined
for continuing to back the science that proves HIV has nothing to do
with AIDS, lifestyle does. http://www.duesberg.com/

If you read the papers of either one of them, you find how honorable
true professional scientists can be in the face of adversity. Duesberg
has been ignored by the HIV religion since 1987, but his publications
are as valid today as they were 23 years ago....

There are, still, true heros in science. But, they're becoming more
rare as the money gets bigger....as Sagan said, "billions and
billions...."



--
"iPad is to computing what Etch-A-Sketch is to art!"

Larry