From: prophet on 21 Sep 2006 04:10 jollyrodgers wrote: >> Later versions (DOpus 5, Magellan) were workbench-replacers that just >> sucked up precious system resources. From what I've seen of the PC >> versions, nothing much has changed. > > I never went past 4.12 for that reason on the Amiga but I > only had 8mb of fast ram back then. > Today with 1gb does it really matter, I don't think so. It's not that it will eat up all of your memory at once, sure :-) But just because we have more memory and computing power these days doesn't mean we should throw efficiency out of the window. I like my filemanagers to be dual-pane, small, fast and expandable. The newer DOpus versions try to be "enhanced" explorer.exe's, and if I liked explorer I wouldn't be using a filemanager in the first place :-) DOpus 5 and up simply defeat their own purpose IMHO. I know it's blasphemy here in a.c.f., but I use Total Commander (bought and paid for). I found it to be one of the best PC equivalents to DOpus 4 (at least, when I was searching for one back in '95). These days, there are plenty of them around, and a lot of them are freeware. freeCommander is a very good example, gets better with each version. Krusader for Linux is also pretty good. btw, DOpus 4 is freeware now: http://dopus.free.fr Might be useful for people still using Amiga's :-)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Canon printer waste ink message Next: Vibe EN306TV media player |