From: BURT on 7 Jul 2010 17:02 You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in a jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness. Flow time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 7 Jul 2010 17:41 On Jul 7, 2:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the > difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in a > jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness. Flow > time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy. > > Mitch Raemsch If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with. Mitch Raemsch
From: DougC on 8 Jul 2010 10:26 BURT blurts: > > If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with. If time slows down, do I have to get a new watch? Doug Chandler
From: BURT on 12 Jul 2010 00:19 On Jul 8, 7:26 am, DougC <priga...(a)aol.com> wrote: > BURT blurts: > > > > > If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with. > > If time slows down, do I have to get a new watch? > > Doug Chandler Only if your slow. You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in a jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness. Flow time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy. Mitch Raemsch
|
Pages: 1 Prev: How can the MMx math be corrected? Next: Impossible Variable Star Curves Predicted by BaTh. |