Prev: Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?
Next: andre@moorelife.nl
From: BURT on 7 Jul 2010 17:02
You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the
difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in a
jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness. Flow
time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy.

Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 7 Jul 2010 17:41
On Jul 7, 2:02 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the
> difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in a
> jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness. Flow
> time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with.

Mitch Raemsch
From: DougC on 8 Jul 2010 10:26
BURT blurts:
>
> If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with.

If time slows down, do I have to get a new watch?

Doug Chandler
From: BURT on 12 Jul 2010 00:19
On Jul 8, 7:26 am, DougC <priga...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>  BURT blurts:
>
>
>
> > If time slows down there must be a fastest time to start with.
>
> If time slows down, do I have to get a new watch?
>
> Doug Chandler

Only if your slow.

You could be in slower or faster time and you would never know the
difference. The appearence is just the same. Even if time changed in
a jump you would not know. This is science's proper time sameness.
Flow time rate can jump in momentum exchange of energy.

Mitch Raemsch
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?
Next: andre@moorelife.nl