Properties of a preferred frame, an inertial frame in SR and
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 19 Jul 2010 20:48 On 7/19/10 7:09 PM, kenseto wrote: > THE FASTEST RUNNING CLOCK IS A CLOCK IN A STATE OF ABSOLUTE REST IN > THE AETHER. > > KEN SETO > Not so. Some clock run fast if the gravitation well of the clock is less than the observer. Pound�Rebka experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-Rebka_experiment ...a test of the general relativity prediction that clocks should run at different rates at different places in a gravitational field. It is considered to be the experiment that ushered in an era of precision tests of general relativity.
From: eric gisse on 19 Jul 2010 22:08 kenseto wrote: [...] > > THE FASTEST RUNNING CLOCK IS A CLOCK IN A STATE OF ABSOLUTE REST IN > THE AETHER. SO KEN SETO, IN WHAT DIRECTION IS THE FASTER CLOCK IN POUND-REBKA MOVING? > > KEN SETO [...]
From: Michael Moroney on 19 Jul 2010 22:16 JT <jonas.thornvall(a)hotmail.com> writes: >On 19 Juli, 00:56, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: >> "JT" wrote in message >> >> news:8184e5eb-4594-494f-a73b-e9ab4388cc78(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >Temporalorder of spatial separated events is absolute >> >> Because you say so. Any proof other than you deciding how nature MUST work? >> >> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- >Yes the law of casuality. 1--A--------------------B--2 A is 1 lightyear from Star 1 and 10 lightyears from Star 2. B is 1 lightyear from Star 2 and 10 lightyears from Star 1. Nothing in this diagram is moving relative to anything else in the diagram. A sees Star 1 go nova and 9 years later sees Star 2 go nova. B sees Star 2 go nova and 9 years later sees Star 1 go nova. The two observers disagree on the order of the stars going nova. They agree that each star goes nova exactly once. In what temporal order did the two stars go nova, and why?
From: kenseto on 20 Jul 2010 07:53 On Jul 19, 8:48 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/19/10 7:09 PM, kenseto wrote: > > > THE FASTEST RUNNING CLOCK IS A CLOCK IN A STATE OF ABSOLUTE REST IN > > THE AETHER. > > > KEN SETO > > Not so. Some clock run fast if the gravitation well of the clock is > less than the observer. Hey idiot gravitational potential effect is due to different states of absolute motion at different gravitational potentials. Ken Seto > > PoundRebka experiment > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-Rebka_experiment > > ...a test of the general relativity prediction that clocks should run > at different rates at different places in a gravitational field. It is > considered to be the experiment that ushered in an era of precision > tests of general relativity.
From: JT on 20 Jul 2010 08:00
On 19 Juli, 00:56, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: > "JT" wrote in message > > news:8184e5eb-4594-494f-a73b-e9ab4388cc78(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Temporal order of spatial separated events is absolute > > Because you say so. Any proof other than you deciding how nature MUST work? > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- Change nick to whatever it would be more suiting, your nonsense critique. JT |