Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: [PATCH 1/2] vmlinux.lds.h: allow people to set a smaller rootfs alignment
Next: iptables slows tproxy SQUID with DNAT or REDIRECT
From: Rafael J. Wysocki on 6 Jun 2010 15:10 On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: .... > > So how TuxOnIce helps here? > Very simple. > > With swsusp, I can save 750MB (memory) + 250 Vram (vram) > With full memory save I can save (1750 MB of memory) + 250 MB of > vram.... So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would it be _that_ _much_ worse? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Maxim Levitsky on 6 Jun 2010 16:00
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 21:04 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > ... > > > So how TuxOnIce helps here? > > Very simple. > > > > With swsusp, I can save 750MB (memory) + 250 Vram (vram) > > With full memory save I can save (1750 MB of memory) + 250 MB of > > vram.... > > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would it > be _that_ _much_ worse? That I agree with you. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |