From: FromTheRafters on 24 Feb 2010 07:10 "Virus Guy" <Virus(a)Guy.com> wrote in message news:4B849A20.7FB4638D(a)Guy.com... > "David H. Lipman" wrote: > >> All the software in the world will NOT protect you if you do bot >> follow Safe Hex practices. > > Safe Hex was a quaint concept 5 - 10 years ago. It's irrelevant > today. > > How does one practice safe hex against DNS poisoning or server-farm > hijacking? One doesn't, what one *does* do is to try to keep their system up to date so that exploits being served from the sites they are being directed (or redirected) to aren't effective. Safe hex isn't just about reading the URL and determining from that whether or not to visit the site, although that *is* a part of it. Years ago I tried to tell folks that there are *no* safe filetypes (all filetypes should be scanned), now I guess one should stress that there are *no* dangerous websites (only dangerous client software). Your statement regarding "safe hex" only indicates your misunderstanding of the concept. It was never the case that (for instance) not opening e-mail attachments from people that you don't know, will keep you safe - only that it will keep you safer. You could still get malware from infected friends, but that does not make the rule irrelevant.
From: Bill on 24 Feb 2010 08:16 X-No-Archive: Yes In article <4b819005$0$5006$607ed4bc(a)cv.net>, Ray K says... >Any suggestions for program combinations that will prevent most of the >bad stuff from ever getting into my computer? Everyone's preferences are different, but whatever you do don't run two on-access scanners at once. Bad idea. My preferred set up is NOD32 augmented with the on-demand version of Malwarebytes. It has been more than adequate for my needs.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Which drives and partitions to scan? Next: سيمزات ( ثيم - ثيمات ) نوكيا E71 و E72 من هنا مجانا |