Prev: The Muir Russell Review
Next: Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?
From: Yousuf Khan on 7 Jul 2010 16:43
Proton Smaller Than Thought�May Rewrite Laws of Physics
"For each hydrogen atom, the team replaced the atom's electron with a
particle called a muon, which is 200 times more massive than an electron.

"Because the muon is so much heavier, it orbits very close to the
proton, so it is sensitive to the proton's size," said team member Aldo
Antognini, of the Paul-Scherrer Institute in Switzerland.

Muons are unstable, and they decay into other particles in just 2.2
microseconds. The team knew that firing a laser at the atom before the
muon decays should excite the muon, causing it to move to a higher
energy level�a higher orbit around the proton. The muon should then
release the extra energy as x-rays and move to a lower energy level.

The distance between these energy levels is determined by the size of
the proton, which in turn dictates the frequency of the emitted x-rays.

But based on the accepted proton radius, the experiment failed to
produce x-rays at the anticipated frequency."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100707-science-proton-smaller-standard-model-quantum-physics/
From: Y.Porat on 9 Jul 2010 13:42
On Jul 7, 10:43 pm, Yousuf Khan <bbb...(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote:
> Proton Smaller Than Thought—May Rewrite Laws of Physics
> "For each hydrogen atom, the team replaced the atom's electron with a
> particle called a muon, which is 200 times more massive than an electron.
>
> "Because the muon is so much heavier, it orbits very close to the
> proton, so it is sensitive to the proton's size," said team member Aldo
> Antognini, of the Paul-Scherrer Institute in Switzerland.
>
> Muons are unstable, and they decay into other particles in just 2.2
> microseconds. The team knew that firing a laser at the atom before the
> muon decays should excite the muon, causing it to move to a higher
> energy level—a higher orbit around the proton. The muon should then
> release the extra energy as x-rays and move to a lower energy level.
>
> The distance between these energy levels is determined by the size of
> the proton, which in turn dictates the frequency of the emitted x-rays.
>
> But based on the accepted proton radius, the experiment failed to
> produce x-rays at the anticipated frequency."http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100707-science-proton...

----------------
the elecron is not orbiting
not schmorbiting around the nuc
2
see ''my chain of orbitals''
at my abstract
and try to understand it

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstrat

ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
From: Y.Porat on 9 Jul 2010 13:47
On Jul 9, 7:42 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 10:43 pm, Yousuf Khan <bbb...(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Proton Smaller Than Thought—May Rewrite Laws of Physics
> > "For each hydrogen atom, the team replaced the atom's electron with a
> > particle called a muon, which is 200 times more massive than an electron.
>
> > "Because the muon is so much heavier, it orbits very close to the
> > proton, so it is sensitive to the proton's size," said team member Aldo
> > Antognini, of the Paul-Scherrer Institute in Switzerland.
>
> > Muons are unstable, and they decay into other particles in just 2.2
> > microseconds. The team knew that firing a laser at the atom before the
> > muon decays should excite the muon, causing it to move to a higher
> > energy level—a higher orbit around the proton. The muon should then
> > release the extra energy as x-rays and move to a lower energy level.
>
> > The distance between these energy levels is determined by the size of
> > the proton, which in turn dictates the frequency of the emitted x-rays.
>
> > But based on the accepted proton radius, the experiment failed to
> > produce x-rays at the anticipated frequency."http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/07/100707-science-proton...
>
> ----------------
> the  elecron is not   orbiting
> not schmorbiting around the nuc
> 2
> see ''my chain of orbitals''
> at my abstract
> and try to  understand it
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstrat
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> --------------------------

sorry typo
i will try again to quote it justr from my memory
whithout committing any c . (:-)

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

hope no typing mistakes

ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: The Muir Russell Review
Next: Particles Larger Than Galaxies Fill the Universe?