Proving ranges of force
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: To "paparios"....was: Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: Reference frames.....Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
From: Igor on 19 Jun 2010 17:04 On Jun 18, 12:33 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that > > > they are not even immeasurable? > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence? > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space. > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye! You can see plenty of galaxies with the naked eye, clueless.
From: BURT on 19 Jun 2010 17:13 On Jun 19, 2:04 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 18, 12:33 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that > > > > they are not even immeasurable? > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence? > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space. > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye! > > You can see plenty of galaxies with the naked eye, clueless. Right but not vary many of them. Not like Andromeda that is close. Mitch Raemsch
From: J. Clarke on 19 Jun 2010 18:02 On 6/19/2010 5:04 PM, Igor wrote: > On Jun 18, 12:33 am, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF<jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>> How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that >>>> they are not even immeasurable? >> >>>> How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence? >>>> Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space. >> >>>> Mitch Reamsch >> >>> the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies >> >> No. We can't see that far with the naked eye! > > You can see plenty of galaxies with the naked eye, clueless. For certain values of "plenty".
From: zookumar yelubandi on 21 Jun 2010 06:43
Ray Vickson wrote: > On Jun 17, 1:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > On 6/17/2010 3:07 PM, BURT wrote: > > > There is no proof until there is measurement. But it is obvious that > > > strong and electric are limited to the atom. > Nonsense. Haven't you ever seen a comb pick up a piece of paper after > it (the comb) has been rubbed in hair? Is a comb bigger than an atom? > Have you ever seen an electromagnet pick up a car in a junkyard? Is a > car bigger than an atom? > R.G. Vickson A comb is a composite of atoms. Ditto, car. BURT's mind bobs in the ebony void of space and there appears little hope of recovery short of extra-terrestial medicines. That being said, your counter fails to shift his contention one iota. Uncle Zook |