Prev: Struct size (bytes) strange behavior
Next: how to take Z transform of Exp term when Exp is Positive
From: Peter Perkins on 14 Jul 2010 09:25
On 7/13/2010 5:54 PM, Raj wrote:
> It would certainly be nice to have this code run faster,
> and it appears to already contain more efficient alternative lines,
> except that they were put in but then commented out.

Raj, you have it the wrong way around. The commented out code is in
there simply to make the lines that actually execute easier to follow.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Struct size (bytes) strange behavior
Next: how to take Z transform of Exp term when Exp is Positive