Prev: Fidelity Netbenefits account activation
Next: Printing to Adobe pdf
From: CWGilley on 19 Mar 2006 18:38
Thank you. I appreciate the response.

--

Clayton
30d 28' 51" N
92d 50' 30" W


"John Pollard" <invalid(a)invalid.com> wrote in message
news:lfkTf.630296$084.429169(a)attbi_s22...
CWGilley wrote:
> Have never had any problems with validating. Usually do one
> after the
> Year-End Start A New File procedure. Will sometimes get a
> message
> about removing transactions not in the register, but no other
> errors.
> On-line status of activated accounts has never been even
> considered.

There would be nothing to tell you that you would have gotten
different results if you had deactivated before Validating.

> Tell me what a Super-Validate is.

Hold down CTRL+SHIFT from just before you click "Validate" until
Quicken tells you it is super-validating.

--
John Pollard
First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
Please reply to newsgroup



From: Rich on 19 Mar 2006 21:00
John Pollard wrote:
> Rich wrote:
>
>>I'm not saying that's incorrect but I have validated & super
>>validated
>>with online activation enabled on all accounts & the
>>validation
>>process completed with no errors.
>
>
> That would not contradict anything I said.
>
> If you have corruption related to online activities (generally,
> data stored in the .qel file), chances are you must disable your
> accounts before Quicken can fix the problems. If you don't have
> such corruption, no deactivation of online services is necessary
> to successfully validate.
>
OK, I see what you mean. I didn't catch the point before that the
corruption preventing validation may be related to online downloading
operations.

Rich
From: Hank Arnold on 20 Mar 2006 04:10
Phew!!! Always nice to hear good news!! Thanks for the feedback........

--
Regards,
Hank Arnold

"Charliec" <charliec(a)invalid.address.com> wrote in message
news:55cr12droh8uf6agoqg2inro4qqk5eg8j8(a)4ax.com...
> Thanks Hank,
> Your item 2 of making a copy of the database apparently did the trick.
> Ofter the copy, I validated the copied database, and the validate
> completed normally with no errors. I compared the copied data to my
> original data and everything looks good.
>
> I'm now using the copied database.
> Thanks again.
> Charlie
>
>>On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:34:40 -0500, "Hank Arnold" <rasilon(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Ack!!! You most likely *do* have a database problem..... I'd do the
>>following (as usual, make sure you do this on a copy of the db):
>>
>>1) If you keep backups of the database, try going back and see if you can
>>do
>>a validate w/o errors. If you can, you might want to consider re-entering
>>the newer transactions.
>>
>>2) use the Q interface to make a copy of the database. This might possibly
>>"fix" things. If *that* fail, then you *really* have a problem!
>>
>>3) Try the "Super Validate" process. **DO NOT DO THIS ON THE ORIGINAL DB.
>>DO
>>IT ON A COPY!!!**. You will want to do a thorough comparison of the
>>validated vs. the original.
> ******************************************************
> Charliec


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Fidelity Netbenefits account activation
Next: Printing to Adobe pdf