Prev: Cranks on the endangered species list
Next: Question on Spacetime dilation.
From: Jay R. Yablon on 15 Dec 2008 21:58
Hello to all:

At the link below is a complete draft of my paper to theoretically
characterize the observed meson masses in QCD.

http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/su-3-paper-20.pdf

In section (11.7) and (11.9), you may see the mass predictions from the
theory, line up against the observed phenomenology. A pretty good fit
for the "simplest case" parameters employed in this first beginning to
end calculation.

Some of the pure math folks may enjoy the complex mathematics in
sections 9 and thereafter, which call upon us to use square and fourth
roots of i.

This is how one fills the so-called Yang-Mills "mass gap."

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon(a)nycap.rr.com
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm

From: George Hammond on 18 Dec 2008 10:44
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:58:31 -0500, "Jay R. Yablon"
<jyablon(a)nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Hello to all:
>
>At the link below is a complete draft of my paper to theoretically
>characterize the observed meson masses in QCD.
>
>http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/su-3-paper-20.pdf
>
>In section (11.7) and (11.9), you may see the mass predictions from the
>theory, line up against the observed phenomenology. A pretty good fit
>for the "simplest case" parameters employed in this first beginning to
>end calculation.
>
>Some of the pure math folks may enjoy the complex mathematics in
>sections 9 and thereafter, which call upon us to use square and fourth
>roots of i.
>
>This is how one fills the so-called Yang-Mills "mass gap."
>
>Jay.
>
>
[George Hammond]
Whew.... a magnificent tour de force.
I'm certainly impressed that a guy your age still has
this kind of lightening bolt energy and crystal clear focus.
Congratulations on the paper, a thing of beauty is joy
forever. All I know about Particle Physics I've learned
from your paper which besides being a physics milestone is
also a pedagogical summit.
=====================================
HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================


From: Jay R. Yablon on 18 Dec 2008 12:13

"George Hammond" <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote in message
news:j4rkk45aju1v4qcltkvbqnsphif2s8sn5c(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:58:31 -0500, "Jay R. Yablon"
> <jyablon(a)nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello to all:
>>
>>At the link below is a complete draft of my paper to theoretically
>>characterize the observed meson masses in QCD.
>>
>>http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/su-3-paper-20.pdf
>>
>>In section (11.7) and (11.9), you may see the mass predictions from
>>the
>>theory, line up against the observed phenomenology. A pretty good fit
>>for the "simplest case" parameters employed in this first beginning to
>>end calculation.
>>
>>Some of the pure math folks may enjoy the complex mathematics in
>>sections 9 and thereafter, which call upon us to use square and fourth
>>roots of i.
>>
>>This is how one fills the so-called Yang-Mills "mass gap."
>>
>>Jay.
>>
>>
> [George Hammond]
> Whew.... a magnificent tour de force.
> I'm certainly impressed that a guy your age still has
> this kind of lightening bolt energy and crystal clear focus.
> Congratulations on the paper, a thing of beauty is joy
> forever. All I know about Particle Physics I've learned
> from your paper which besides being a physics milestone is
> also a pedagogical summit.

Thanks George,

Much appreciated!!!

Jay.

From: Ken S. Tucker on 19 Dec 2008 06:33
On Dec 18, 7:44 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:58:31 -0500, "Jay R. Yablon"
>
>
>
> <jyab...(a)nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> >Hello to all:
>
> >At the link below is a complete draft of my paper to theoretically
> >characterize the observed meson masses in QCD.
>
> >http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/su-3-paper-20.pdf
>
> >In section (11.7) and (11.9), you may see the mass predictions from the
> >theory, line up against the observed phenomenology. A pretty good fit
> >for the "simplest case" parameters employed in this first beginning to
> >end calculation.
>
> >Some of the pure math folks may enjoy the complex mathematics in
> >sections 9 and thereafter, which call upon us to use square and fourth
> >roots of i.
>
> >This is how one fills the so-called Yang-Mills "mass gap."
>
> >Jay.
>
> [George Hammond]
> Whew.... a magnificent tour de force.
> I'm certainly impressed that a guy your age still has
> this kind of lightening bolt energy and crystal clear focus.
> Congratulations on the paper, a thing of beauty is joy
> forever. All I know about Particle Physics I've learned
> from your paper which besides being a physics milestone is
> also a pedagogical summit.

I find the paper extraordinarily sophisticated,
within the domain of a specialist. For me to
appreciate it more fully I'd need a road-map
at the front end past the Abstract, to get an
overview of the logical process, apart from the
details of the linear logic that are within the
body of the paper.
For this paper to be a success the referee(s)
themselves need to have confidence in the road-
map and then check the intervening details, and
use lots of check marks :-).
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Cranks on the endangered species list
Next: Question on Spacetime dilation.