From: spudnik on 22 Jul 2010 15:57 where did the N and k go, and how is it different from *vis viva*?... anyway, there are lots of Einsteinmaniacs who believe that "M&M got 'no result,'" but taht doesn't make it, so. > c(v=V1) = c(v=V2) which comes from an analytical bungle from the null > results of the MMI experiment as opposed to > c(v=V) = c(mu,ep) + V ... thus: you want credentials, check doctor S. Fred Singer's (or, you could just *read* his old, retrospective metastudy on glaciers. thus: anyone can grok spatial math, just by beginning with the 14th Book of Euclid, which is actually by Hypsicles; but, I can't do it for you, either. > BP's cap&trade is before the Senate; it appears that > the financial reform bill actually puts-off regulating > the derivatives for so long, that it amounts to a "prelude" > to BP's cap and trade. thus: so, what is the difference between Liebniz' *vis viva*, and your example with the N and the k? thus: I know what Thermite (TM) is, and I didn't even googol it. > Professor Dr Steven Jones, who sacrificed his career at BYU thus: if the entagnlement of two Newtonian rocks o'light, could traansmit information, then it would be some thing, but they are actually not photons per se. thus: more folks should know about this quantumization! > I no longer accept redshift as a Doppler motion and > that would have huge consequence to a Tifft quantization. --BP's next bailout of Wall St. and "the City" (of London, gated community & financial district), or the last, if nothing is left of the USA. http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin
|
Pages: 1 Prev: CPA AFFILIATE NETWORKS AWESOME EARNINGS FROM YOUR HOME Next: Ohms law power problem |